Skip to main content

Implications of Electronic Commerce for Fiscal Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter, I will consider both sides of the relationship between electronic commerce and fiscal policy. For the impact of electronic commerce on fiscal policy, I will pay particular attention to the potential sales-tax revenue losses. The data suggest that the potential losses are actually modest over the next several years. I will also consider the reverse relationship – how fiscal policy affects Internet commerce. Here the evidence suggests that taxes have a sizable effect. I point out, though, that this only supports special treatment if there is some positive externality. Without one, the tax system will lead to excessive online buying to avoid taxes. I will then deal the neglected issue of taxes and Internet access, which can create large deadweight costs both because demand may be price-sensitive and because taxes can slow the spread of new technologies. Finally, I offer some discussion of the international context of taxes and the Internet and the international temptations to raise rates on E-commerce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce. 2000. Report to Congress. < www.ecommercecommission.org/acec_report.pdf>.

  • Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations. 1986. State and Local Taxation of Out-of-State Mail Order Sales. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. 2000. The Hidden Impact of not Taxing E-Commerce. Business Week (28 February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Steven, Stan Dolberg, Shah Cheema, and Jeremy Sharrard. 1998. Resizing Online Business Trade. The Forrester Report 2, no. 5 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhoff, Josh, Shelley Morrisette, and Kenneth Clemmer. 1998. Technographics Service Explained. The Forrester Report (January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group. 1998. The State of Internet Retailing. Mimeo. (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, Globe. 1998. Governors Fear Tax Loss from Internet. December 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, Donald, and William Fox. 2000. E-Commerce in the Context of Declining State Sales Tax Bases. Mimeo. University of Tennessee Center for Business and Economic Research (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Michael Smith. 2000. The Great Equalizer? Consumer Choice at Internet Shopbots. Mimeo. M.I.T. Sloan School (July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, William, and Thomas Neubig. 1999. The Sky Is not Falling: Why State and Local Revenues Were not Significantly Impacted by the Internet in 1998. Ernst and Young, Economics Consulting and Quantitative Analysis (June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eads, James, Harley Duncan, Walter Hellerstein, Andrea Ireland, Paul Mines, and Bruce Reid. 1997. National Tax Association Communications and Electronic Commerce Tax Project Report No. 1 of the Drafting Committee. State Tax Notes 13: 1255. Doc 97-30985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, William, and Matthew Murray. 1997. The Sales Tax and Electronic Commerce: So What’s New? National Tax Journal 50, no. 3: 573–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, Austan. 2000a. Competition in the Computer Industry: Retail Versus Online. Mimeo. University of Chicago, GSB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, Austan. 2000b. In a World Without Borders: The Impact of Taxes on Internet Commerce. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, no. 2 (May): 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, Austan. 2000c. Tax Sensitivity, Internet Commerce, and the Generation Gap. Tax Policy and the Economy, volume 14, 45–65, edited by James Poterba. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, Austan. 2000d. The Value of Broadband and the Deadweight Loss of Taxing New Technologies. Mimeo. University of Chicago, GSB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, Austan, and Jonathan Zittrain. 1999. Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Taxing Internet Commerce. National Tax Journal 52, no. 3 (September): 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, Austan, and Peter Klenow. 1999. Evidence on Learning and Network Externalities in the Diffusion of Home Computers. NBER WP#7329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham ,Senator Robert. 1999. Should the Internet Be Taxed? Communities Hurt if the Web Isn’t Taxed. Roll Call, 22 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry. 1997. Valuing the Effect of Regulation on New Services in Telecommunications. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity; Microeconomics, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman Jerry. 1998. Taxation by Telecommunications Regulation. Tax Policy and the Economy, Chapter 12, edited by James Poterba. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein, Walter. 1997a. Telecommunications and Electronic Commerce: Overview and Appraisal. State Tax Notes 12, no. 7: 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein, Walter. 1997b. Transactions Taxes and Electronic Commerce: Designing State Taxes That Work in an Interstate Environment. National Tax Journal 50, no. 3: 593–606.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein, Walter. 1997c. State Taxation of Electronic Commerce: Preliminary Thoughts on Model Uniform Legislation. Presented at the Symposium on Multi-Jurisdictional Taxation of Electronic Commerce at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass. State Tax Notes 12, no. 17 (5 April): 1315–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasrel, Bruce, Christopher Mines, and Karen Kopikis. 1999 From Dial-Up to Broadband. The Forrester Report (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Charles. 1997a. Electronic Commerce, State Sales Taxation, and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations. National Tax Journal 50, no. 4: 731–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Charles. 1997b. Taxation of Electronic Commerce: Economic Objectives, Technological Constraints, and Tax Law. Tax Law Review 52, no. 3 (Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Charles. 1999a. Achieving Neutrality Between Electronic and Nonelectronic Commerce. State Tax Notes 17, no. 3 (July): 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Charles. 1999b. Electronic Commerce and the State Retail Sales Tax: A Challenge to American Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance 6, no.2 (May): 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuivey, James, and Gillian DeMoulin. 2000. States Lose Half a Billion in Taxes to Web Retail. Technographics Brief. Forrester, Cambridge, Mass. (24 February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Nathan. 1995. Prop 13 Meets the Internet: How State and Local Government Finances Are Becoming Road Kill on the Information Superhighway. Mimeo. Center for Community Economic Research, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordan, Matthew, Cliff Condon, Abigail Leland, and Wouter Aghina. 2000. Retail’s Pan-European Future. The Forrester Report (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, William. 2000. E-Commerce and Taxation. Mimeo. Yale University (9 June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, Michael. 1999. Sales Tax Would Hurt E-Commerce. Internetnews.com (19 September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prem, Richard, et al. 1999. Establishing a Framework to Evaluate E-Commerce Tax Policy Options. Report of Deloitte and Touche and University of California at Berkeley (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul. 1994. New Goods, Old Theory, and the Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions. Journal of Development Economics 43: 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, Bob. 2000. Some Retailers Go Against the Grain in Integrating Their Online Operations. New York Times (5 June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trandel, Gregory. 1992. Evading the Use Tax on Cross-Border Sales: Pricing and Welfare Effects. Journal of Public Economics 35: 333–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census. Monthly Retail Sales. Various Issues. Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US General Accounting Office (GAO). 2000. Sales Taxes: Electronic Commerce Growth Presents Challenges: Revenue Losses Are Uncertain. Report to Congressional Requesters (June). GAO/GGD/OCE-00-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, Hal. 1999. Estimating the Demand for Bandwidth. Mimeo, University of California (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, Hal. 2000. Taxation of Electronic Commerce. Mimeo. University of California (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Seema, David Cooperstein, David Weisman, and Thalika Oum. 1999. Post-Web Retail. The Forrester Report (September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, George. 2000. Network Externalities and Preferential Taxation of E-Commerce. Mimeo. Rice University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Austan Goolsbee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goolsbee, A. (2009). Implications of Electronic Commerce for Fiscal Policy. In: Lehr, W., Pupillo, L. (eds) Internet Policy and Economics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/b104899_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b104899_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0037-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0038-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics