Skip to main content

Optimization of a complex chemical process using an equation oriented model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Applications

Part of the book series: Mathematical Programming Studies ((MATHPROGRAMM,volume 20))

Abstract

Meaningful evaluation of the utility and performance of available nonlinear programming techniques for engineering design optimization requires the availability of realistic design models. Such models have been notably lacking in the process design area. In this paper a detailed equation oriented model of a process for the production of ethylene oxide and ethylene glycol is developed to fill this void. The model involves a large number of variables and equality constraints which are by equation sequencing reduced to 22 independent and equality constraints which are by equation sequencing reduced to 22 independent variables, nineteen constraints, as well as bounds. The salient features of such models, their usefulness and limitations are presented. The applicability of available NLP algorithms and inherent difficulties in their application are discussed. Test results are reported with representative codes. GRG codes are found to provide the only practical approach to large scale design optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Adelman and W.F. Stevens, “Process optimization by the complex method”, AIChE Journal 18 (1972) 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S.H. Ballman and J.L. Gaddy, “Optimization of methanol process by flowsheet simulation”, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 16 (1977) 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.A. Barneson, “Picking optimization methods”, Chemical Engineering 77 (1970) 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bracken and G.P. McCormick, Selected applications of nonlinear programming (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. R.R. Buntin “A kinetic study of oxidation of ethylene on a silver catalyst”, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.M. Considine, ed., Chemical and process technology encyclopedia (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.S. Dembo, “GGP: A computer program for the solution of generalized geometric programming problems: Users manual”, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.W. Dibella and W.F. Stevens, “Process optimization by nonlinear programming”, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 4 (1965) 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E.D. Eason and R.G. Fenton, “Testing and evaluation of numerical methods for design optimization”, UTME-TP 7204, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H.E. Eduljee, “Equations replace Gilliland plot”, Hydrocarbon Processing 54 (1975) 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.D. Gaines and J.L. Gaddy, “Process optimization by flowsheet simulation”, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 15 (1976) 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E.W. Gorczynski, H.P. Hutchinson, and A.R.M. Wajih, “Development of a modularly original equation oriented process simulator”, CACE 79, Montreux, Switzerland (April 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B.S. Gottfried, “Nonlinear process optimization by a Monte Carlo simulation technique”, personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.M. Guthrie, “Data and techniques for preliminary capital cost estimating”, in: H. Popper, ed., Modern cost engineering techniques (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Hernandez and R.W.H. Sargent, “A new algorithm for process flowsheeting”, CACE 79, 12th Symposium on Computer Applications in Chemical Engineering, Montreux, Switzerland (April 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B.S. Jung, W. Mirosh and W.H. Ray, “A study of large scale optimization techniques”, AIChE 71st National Meeting, Dallas, TX (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L.S. Lasdon, A.D. Warren, A. Jain and M.W. Ratner, “Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming”, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 4 (1978) 34–50.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Luus and T.H.I. Jaakola, “Optimization by direct search and systematic reduction of the size of search region”, AIChE Journal 19 (1973) 760–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Luus and T.H.I. Jaakola, “A note on the application of nonlinear programming to chemical process optimization”, Operations Research 22 (1974) 415–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.T. Mason and O.K. Crosser, “Optimal search on the return on investment surface of a small chemical plant”, paper presented at AIChE 71st National Meeting, Dallas, TX (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. McCabe and J.C. Smith, Unit operations of chemical engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. McLane, M.K. Sood and G.V. Reklaitis, “A hierarchical strategy for large scale process calculations”, CACE 79, Montreux, Switzerland (April 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.L. Motard, M. Shacham and E.M. Rosen, “Steady state chemical process simulation”, AIChE Journal 21 (1975) 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. W.C. Mylander, R.L. Holmes and G.P. McCormick, “A guide to SUMT-version 4: The computer program implementing the sequential unconstrained minimization technique for nonlinear programming”, Paper RAC-P-63, Research Analysis Corporation, McLean, VA (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.L. Parker and R.R. Hughes, “Computational problems in the implementation of quadratic approximation programming”, paper presented at the AIChE Meeting, Houston, TX (April 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  26. W.A. Parker and J.W. Prados, “Analog computer design of an ethylene glycol system”, Chemical Engineering Progress 60 (1964) 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.S. Peters and K.D. Timmerhaus, Plant design and economics for chemical engineers (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  28. M.J. Rijckaert and X.M. Martens, “Analysis and optimization of the Williams-Otto process by geometric programming”, AIChE Journal 20 (1974) 742–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M.J. Rijckaert and X.M. Martens, “Biographical note on geometric programming”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 26 (1978) 325–329.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. R.R. Root, “An investigation of method of multipliers”, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. E.M. Rose, “A machine computation method for performing material balances”, Chemical Engineering Progress 58 (1962) 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. Sandgren, “The utility of nonlinear programming algorithms”, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.W.H. Sargent, “The decomposition of systems of procedures and algebraic equations”, in: Lecture Notes in Mathematics 630 (Springer, Berlin, 1978) pp. 158–178.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R.W.H. Sargent and A.W. Westerberg, “Speed-up in chemical engineering design”, Transactions of the Institutions of Chemical Engineers 42 (1964) 190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P.V.L.N. Sarma, “Strategy of modeling and optimization in chemical process design”, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.D. Seader, W.D. Seider and A.C. Pauls, “FLOWTRAN simulation—An introduction”, 2nd ed. (Ulrich’s Bookstore, Ann Arbor, MI, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  37. B.D. Smith, Design of equilibrium state processes, (McGraw-Hill, New York., 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Sriram and W.F. Stevens, “An example of the application of nonlinear programming to chemical-process optimization”, Operations Research 21 (1973) 296–302.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. W.F. Stevens, “Applications of nonlinear programming to chemical engineering process optimization”, paper presented at the ORSA Meeting, New Orleans, LA (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  40. P.B. Stewart and P. Mungal, “Correlation equation for solubility of carbon dioxide in water, seawater, and seawater concentrates”, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 2 (1971) 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. R.E. Treybal, Mass transfer operations, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  42. A.D. Warren and L.S. Lasdon, “The status of nonlinear programming software”, Operations Research 27 (1979) 431–448.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. A.W. Westerberg, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  44. T.J. Williams and R.E. Otto, “A generalized chemical processing model for the investigation of computer control”, AIEE Transactions Part 1, Communications and Electronics 79 (1960) 458–471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Louis Goffin Jean-Marc Rousseau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 The Mathematical Programming Society, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarma, P.V.L.N., Reklaitis, G.V. (1982). Optimization of a complex chemical process using an equation oriented model. In: Goffin, JL., Rousseau, JM. (eds) Applications. Mathematical Programming Studies, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121229

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121229

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00851-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00852-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics