Skip to main content

Notes on Bland’s pivoting rule

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polyhedral Combinatorics

Part of the book series: Mathematical Programming Studies ((MATHPROGRAMM,volume 8))

Abstract

Recently R.G. Bland proposed two new rules for pivot selection in the simplex method. These elegant rules arise from Bland’s work on oriented matroids; their virtue is that they never lead to cycling. We investigate the efficiency of the first of them. On randomly generated problems with 50 nonnegative variables and 50 additional inequalities, Bland’s rule requires about 400 iterations on the average; the corresponding figure for the popular “largest coefficient” rule is only about 100. Comparable behaviour seems to persist even on highly degenerate problems. On the theoretical side, we analyse the performance of Bland’s rule on the classical Klee-Minty examples: for problems with n nonnegative variables and n additional inequalities, the number of iterations is bounded from below by the n-th Fibonacci number.

This research was supported by NRC grant A9211.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E.M.L. Beale, “Cycling in the dual simplex algorithm”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 2 (1955) 269–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. R.G. Bland, “New finite pivoting rules for the simplex method”, Mathematics of Operations Research 2 (1977) 103–107.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Charnes, “Optimality and degeneracy in linear programming”, Econometrica 20 (1952) 160–170.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. G.B. Dantzig, A. Orden and P. Wolfe, “Generalized simplex method for minimizing a linear form under linear inequality constraints”, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 5 (1955) 183–195.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A.J. Hoffman, “Cycling in the simplex algorithm”, National Bureau of Standards Report 2974 (December 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.G. Jeroslow, “The simplex algorithm with the pivot rule of maximizing improvement criterion”, Discrete Mathematics 4 (1973) 367–377.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Klee and G.J. Minty, “How good is the simplex algorithm?”, in: O. Shisha, ed., Inequalities-III (Academic Press, New York, 1972) pp. 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Kuhn and R.E. Quandt, “An experimental study of the simplex method”, in: N.C. Metropolis et al., eds., Experimental arithmetic, high-speed computing and mathematics, Proceedings of Symposia on Applied Mathematics XV (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1963) pp. 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Wolfe, “A technique for resolving degeneracy in linear programming”, Journal of SIAM 11 (1963) 205–211.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

M. L. Balinski A. J. Hoffman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 The Mathematical Programming Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avis, D., Chvátal, V. (1978). Notes on Bland’s pivoting rule. In: Balinski, M.L., Hoffman, A.J. (eds) Polyhedral Combinatorics. Mathematical Programming Studies, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121192

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121192

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00789-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00790-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics