Advertisement

Influence of pressure and solvent composition on the density gradient in the analytical ultracentrifuge. II direct refractometric determination of the equilibrium and non-equilibrium density gradient

  • M. D. Lechner
  • U. Sedlack
  • W. Mächtle
Polymers, Colloids, And Supramolecular Systems
Part of the Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science book series (PROGCOLLOID, volume 107)

Abstract

A method for the direct refractometric determination of the density gradient in an analytical ultracentrifuge has been described. It is based on two assumptions: 1) the Schlieren optics measure the refractive index gradient, the interference optics the refractive index, and the absorption optics the absorption of the density gradient solution (consisting of a light and a heavy solvent component) and 2) there is a relationship between the refractive index or the absorption, on the one hand and the density of the density gradient solution, on the other. The method has been demonstrated on water/metrizamide/polystyrene latex solutions with different concentrations of metrizamide (a heavy sugar). Advantages of this method are: first, the pressure and the composition effect are included in this method and must not be corrected as usual and second, it is not necessary to measure at sedimentation equilibrium; it would be possible to measure at times before the equilibrium is achieved. That means the method represents a quasi-dynamic density gradient method.

Key words

Analytical ultracentrifuge density gradient refractometric determination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hermans JJ, Ende HA (1963) J Polym Sci C1:161Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hearst JE, Vinograd J (1961) Proc Nat Acad Sci US 47:999, 1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Munk P (1982) Macromolecules, 15:500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lechner MD, Mächtle W, unpublishedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rickwood D (1979) Metrizamide. Nyegaard & Co., Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lechner MD, Mächtle W, Sedlack U (1997) this volumeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mächtle W, Klodwig U (1979) Makromol Chem 180:2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mächtle W (1984) Coll Polym Sci 262:270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Lechner
    • 1
  • U. Sedlack
    • 1
  • W. Mächtle
    • 2
  1. 1.Physikalische ChemieUniversität OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Kunststofflaboratorium Polymerphysik BASF AGLudwigshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations