Advertisement

Integration of gravity and altimeter data by optimal estimation techniques

  • Per Knudsen
Seminars
Part of the Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences book series (LNEARTH, volume 50)

Keywords

Gravity Anomaly Altimeter Data Geoid Height Orbit Error Satellite Altimeter Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arabelos, D., P. Knudsen, and C.C. Tscherning: Covariance and Bias Treatment when Combining Gravimetry, Altimetry, and Gradiometer Data by Collocation. Proceedings of the IAG Symposia, International Association of Geodesy, Paris, 443–454, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. Blanc, F., S. Houry, P. Mazzega, and J.F. Minster: A High-resolution, High-accuracy Altimeter-Derived Mean Sea Surface in the Norwegia Sea. Marine Geodesy, Vol. 14, No. 1, 57–76, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Colton, M.T., and R.R.P. Chase: Interaction of the Antartic Circumpolar Current With Bottom Topography: An Investigation Using Satellite Altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 88, No. C3, 1825–1843, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Denker, D., and R.H. Rapp: Geodetic and Oceanographic Results from the Analysis of One Year of Geosat Data. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 95, N. C8, 13151–13168, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Drottning, Å, and P. Knudsen: An Analysis of Geosat Altimetry off Mid-Norway. Poster presented IUGG XX General Assembly, Symposium U 5, Vienna, 11–24 August, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. Engelis, T.: Global Circulation from SEASAT Altimeter Data. Marine Geodesy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 45–69, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. Engelis T.: On the Simultaneous Improvement of a Satellite Orbit and Determination of Sea Surface Topography Using Altimeter Data. Manuscripta Geodaetica Vol. 13, No. 3, 180–190, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. Engelis, T., and P. Knudsen: Orbit Improvement and Determination of the Oceanic Geoid and Topography from 17 Days of Seasat Data. Manuscripta Geodaetica, Vol. 14, No. 3, 193–201, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Forsberg, R.: A Study of Terrain Reduction, Density Anomalies and Geophysical Inversion Methods in Gravity Field Modelling. Report No. 355, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Fu, L.-L., and V. Zlotnicki: Observing Oceanic Mesoscale Eddies from Geosat Altimetry: Preliminary Results. Geophys. Res. Lett., Vol. 16, No. 5, 457–460, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. Heck, B., and R. Rummel: Strategies for Solving the Vertical Datum Problem Using Terrestrial and Satellite Geodetic Data. Proceedings IAG Symposia, Edinburgh, 1989, 104: “Sea Surface Topography and the Geoid”, 116–128, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Heiskanen, W. A., and Moritz, H.: Physical Geodesy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1967.Google Scholar
  13. Jekeli, C.: Using Line Averages in Least Squares Collocation. Bulletin Géodésique, Vol. 63, No. 2, 203–212, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knudsen, P.: Estimation and Modelling of the Local Empirical Covariance Function using gravity and satellite altimeter data. Bulletin Géodésique, Vol. 61, 145–160, 1987a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knudsen, P.: Adjustment of Satellite Altimeter Data from Cross-over Differences using Covariance Relations for the time Varying Components represented by Gaussian Functions. Proceedings IAG Symposia, 617–628, International Association of Geodesy, Paris, 1987b.Google Scholar
  16. Knudsen, P.: Determination of local empirical covariance functions from residual terrain reduced altimeter data. Reports of the Dep. of Geodetic Science and Surveying no. 395, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. Knudsen, P.: Some Accuracy Estimates of Local Geoids. In R.H. Rapp and F. Sansò: Determination of the Geoid—Present and Future. IAG Symposia 106, Springer-Verlag, 422–431, 1990a.Google Scholar
  18. Knudsen, P.: An Analysis of the Quasi-stationary Sea Surface Topography in the Norwegian Sea Using Geosat Altimetry and Gravimetry. Paper presented AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, December 3–7, Abstract G12A-2 in EOS, Vol. 71, No. 43, 1990b.Google Scholar
  19. Knudsen, P.: Simultaneous Estimation of the Gravity Field and Sea Surface Topography From Satellite Altimeter Data by Least Squares Collocation. Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 104 No. 2, 307–317, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knudsen, P.: Estimation of Sea Surface Topography in the Norwegian Sea Using Gravimetry and Geosat Altimetry. Bulletin Géodésique, Vol. 66, No. 1, 27–40, 1992a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knudsen, P.: Separation of Residual Ocean Tide Signals in a Collinear Analysis of Geosat Altimetry. Presented EGS XVII General Assembly, G5, Edinburgh, April 6–10, 1992b.Google Scholar
  22. Knudsen, P., O. Baltazar Andersen, and C.C. Tscherning: Altimetric Gravity Anomalies in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea—Preliminary Results from the ERS-135 days Repeat Mission. Geophys. Res. Lett., in press, July 1992.Google Scholar
  23. Knudsen, P., and M. Brovelli: Collinear and Cross-over Adjustment of Geosat ERM and Seasat Altimeter Data in the Mediterranean Sea. Surveys in Geophysics, in press, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. Koblinsky, C.J., R.S. Nerem, S.M. Klosko, and R.G. Williamson: Global Scale Variations in Sea Surface Topography Determined from Satellite Altimetry. Presented IUGG XX General Assembly, Symposium U 13, Vienna, 11–24 August, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. Marsh, J.G., C.J. Koblinsky, F.J. Lerch, S.M. Klosko, T.V. Martin, J.W. Robbins, R.G. Williamson, and G.B. Patel: Dynamic Sea Surface Topography, Gravity, and Improved Orbit Accuracies from the Direct Evaluation of Seasat Altimeter Data. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 95, N. C8, 13129–13150, 1990.Google Scholar
  26. Mazzega, P., and S. Houry: An experiment to invert Seasat altimetry for the Mediterranean and Black Sea mean surface. Geophysical Journal, 96, 259–272, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menard, Y.: Observations of Eddy Fields in the Northwest Atlantic and Northwest Pacific by SEASAT Altimeter Data. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 88, No. C3, 1853–1866, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. Milbert, D., B. Douglas, R. Cheney, L. Miller, and R. Agreen: Calculation of Sea Level Time Series from Noncollinear GEOSAT Altimeter Data. Marine Geodesy, Vol. 12, 287–302, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moritz, H.: Advanced Physical Geodesy. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. Nerem, R.S., B.D. Tapley, and C.K. Shum: Determination of the Ocean Circulation Using Geosat Altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 95, N. C3, 3163–3179, 1990.Google Scholar
  31. Sansò, F.: Statistical Methods in Physical Geodesy. In: Sünkel, H.: Mathematical and Numerical Techniques in Physical Geodesy. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. 7, 49–155, Springer-Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
  32. Schrama, E.J.O.: The Role of Orbit Errors in Processing of Satellite Altimeter Data. Report No. 33, Netherlands Geodetic Commission. Publications on geodesy, New series, Delft, 1989.Google Scholar
  33. Tai, C.-K.: On Generating Altimetric Sea Level Time Series from Crossover Differences. Marine Geodesy, Vol. 12, 303–313, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tapley, B.D., and G.W. Rosborough: Geographically Correlated Orbit Errors and Its Effects on Satellite Altimetry Missions. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 90, No. C6, 11817–11831, 1985.Google Scholar
  35. Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier Publishers B.V., ISBN 0-444-42765-1, 1987.Google Scholar
  36. Tscherning, C.C.: Functional Methods for Gravity Field Approximation. In: Sünkel, H.: Mathematical and Numerical Techniques in Physical Geodesy. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. 7, 3–47, Springer-Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
  37. Tscherning, C.C., and P. Knudsen: Determination of bias parameters for satellite altimetry by least squares collocation. Proceedings of the International Associations of Geodesy, Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Rome, June 3–6, 833–853, 1986.Google Scholar
  38. Tscherning, C.C., and R.H. Rapp: Closed Covariance Expressions for Gravity Anomalies, Geoid Undulations, and Deflections of the Vertical Implied by Anomaly Degree Variances. Report no. 208, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1974.Google Scholar
  39. Wagner, C.A.: Accuracy Estimates of Geoid and Ocean Topography Recovered Jointly From Satellite Altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 91, No. B1, 453–461, 1986.Google Scholar
  40. Wunsch, C., and V. Zlotnicki: The accuracy of altimetric surfaces. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 78, 795–808, 1984.Google Scholar
  41. Zlotnicki, V.: On the Accuracy of Gravimetric Geoids and the Recovery of Oceanographic Signals from Altimetry. Marine Geodesy, Vol. 8, 129–157, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Knudsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Kort-og MatrikelstyrelsenKøbenhavn NV

Personalised recommendations