Advertisement

Mode coupling corrections tot he Onsager coefficient as determined by light scattering of critical concentration fluctuations from polymer mixtures

  • G. Meier
  • B. Momper
  • E. W. Fischer
Chapter
Part of the Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science book series (PROGCOLLOID, volume 91)

Abstract

We report static and dynamic light-scattering experiments of an almost symmetric polymer mixture made up from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), N=260 and polyethylmethylsiloxane (PEMS), N=340 with N being the degree of polymerization. The mixture exhibits an upper critical solution temperature T c≃57°C with a critical composition φ C, PEMS=0.465. The measurements were performed in a broad temperature range in the one-phase region between −0.7<ɛ<−2.5 with ɛ=T−T c/T. From measurements of the mutual diffusion coefficient \(\tilde D\)and the static structure factor S(q=0), the Onsager coefficient \(L(q) = \tilde DS(q = 0)\)was calculated. It is related to W 0, a microscopic frequency, given by the Rouse diffusion coefficient D R 0 =W 0/N via L=φ(1−φ)W 0. We have basically found that for values of the correlation length ς of concentration fluctuations smaller than the coil size, W 0 behaves according to Rouse theory, but in the hydrodynamic regime, where one probes the slow diffusive dynamics of concentration fluctuations with wavelengths larger than the size of the polymer coil and the correlation length, W 0 tends to accelerate as TT c. Using the mode-mode coupling prediction that in the cited regime W 0 is proportional to ς we have removed the apparent discrepancy.

Key words

Critical phenomena light scattering polymer mixtures Onsager coefficient mode-mode coupling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van Hove L (1954) Phys Rev 95:1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swinney H, Henry D (1973) Phys Rev A 8:2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fixman M (1962) J Chem Phys 36:310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kadanoff LP, Swift J (1968) Phys Rev 166:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oxtoby D, Gelbart W (1973) J Chem Phys 61:2957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawasaki K (1970) Ann Phys (NJ) 61:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fredrickson GH (1986) J Chem Phys 85:3556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brereton MG, Fischer EW, Fytas G, Murschall U (1987) J Chem Phys 86:5174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brochard F, de Gennes PG (1983) Physica A 118:289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    For a detailed analysis see the extended paper: Meier G, Momper D, Fischer EW (1992) J Chem Phys 97:0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Binder K (1983) J Chem Phys 79:6387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stepanek P, Lodge TP, Kedrowski C, Bates FS (1991) J Chem Phys 94:8289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Meier
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Momper
    • 1
  • E. W. Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für PolymerforschungMainzFRG
  2. 2.KFA JülichJülichFRG

Personalised recommendations