Advertisement

The form of the spin-orbit potential for spin-1/2 particles

  • S. Roman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 89)

Abstract

The spin-orbit part of the 3He optical model potential determined from the elastic scattering measurements including 3He polarization data for a range of nuclei, is characterized by a small diffuseness parameter within the range 0.2 ≤ aSO ≤ 0.4 fm for most nuclei. This recent finding for 3He is compared with the available triton (Los Alamos) and nucleon elastic scattering data, which are re-examined in terms of the conventional parametrization with derivative Woods-Saxon form of the spin-orbit potential. It is found that the neutron elastic scattering data are consistent with a spin-orbit potential with sharp surface localization, in contrast to the established proton and triton potentials, confirmed in the present analysis. The suggestion that the difference between the triton and 3He spin-orbit potential reflects a similar difference in the behaviour of protons and neutrons in the asymptotic region is admittedly based on the very scarce fast neutron elastic scattering polarization data available. It is shown how additional information may be obtained from study of (d,n) reactions, which are sensitive to the neutron spin-orbit potential geometry.

Keywords

Elastic Scattering Polarization Data Optical Model Parameter DWBA Calculation Elastic Neutron Scattering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W.E. Burcham et al., Nucl. Phys. A246 (1975) 269.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Karban et al., Nucl. Phys. A292 (1977) 1.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.-W. Lui et al., to be published.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.D. Cohler et al., J. Phys. G, 2 (1976) L151.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.M. Clarke et al., unpublished; S. Roman, Proc. 4th Polarization Symposium, Zurich, 1975, p. 259.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.F. Barnwell et al., to be published.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Roman et al., Nucl. Phys. A284 (1977) 365.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.A. Hardekopf et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 1623.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.A. Schmelzbach et al., Phys. Rev. C17 (1978) 16.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.D. Becchetti Jr. and G.W. Greenlees, Phys. Rev. 182 (1969) 1190.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Wong et al. Phys. Rev. 238 (1962) 2339 (polarization), T.P. Stuart et al., Phys. Rev. 125 (1962) (cross sections).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Sene et al., Proc. 3rd Polarization Symposium, Madison, 1971, p. 611, P.L. Beach et al., Phys. Rev. 156 (1967) 1201 (cross sections).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.H. Hussein et al., Phys. Rev. C15 (1977) 233.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.A. Quin et al., Nucl. Phys. A183 (1972) 173.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.P. Hichwa et al., Nucl. Phys. A258 (1976) 21.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Roman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsThe University of BirminghamEngland

Personalised recommendations