Advertisement

Folding description of elastic and inelastic scattering

  • F. Petrovich
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 89)

Abstract

The essential features of the folding description of elastic and inelastic scattering reactions are reviewed. A momentum space technique for evaluating folding integrals is emphasized and approximate methods for treating knockout exchange are discussed. Various “realistic” interactions which have been popular in folding model calculations are listed and a qualitative summary of their properties is given. Several applications of the folding model are considered. These cover both elastic and inelastic scattering as well as both nucleon-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions. Specific examples where the tensor and spin-orbit interaction components enter are included. Some new results concerning the excitation of high spin states in 208Pb by 135 MeV are of particular interest.

Keywords

Matrix Interaction Exchange Term Impulse Approximation Folding Model Imaginary Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K.M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 89, 575 (1953); N. Francis and K.M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 92. 291 (1953); G. Takeda and K.M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 97, 1336 (1955); K.M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 105, 1388 (1957).zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.K. Kerman, H. McManus, and R.M. Thaler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 8, 551, (1959).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.M. Haybron and H. McManus, Phys. Rev. 136, B1730 (1964); 140, B638 (1965); R.M. Haybron, M.B. Johnson, and R.J. Metzger, Phys. Rev. 156, 1136 (1967); H.K. Lee and H. McManus, Phys. Rev. 161, 1087 (1967).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A95, 1 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.M. Austin, in The Two-Body Force in Nuclei, ed. S.M. Austin and G.M. Crawley (Plenum, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Slanina and H. McManus, Nucl. Phys. A116, 271 (1968); F. Petrovich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 895 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.G. Love et al., Phys. Lett. 29B, 478 (1969); W.G. Love and G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A159, 1 (1970); L.W. Owen and G.R. Satchler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1720 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.R. Satchler, Phys. Lett. 35B, 279 (1971); G.R. Satchler, Comm. Nucl. Particle Phys. 5, 379 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.A. Agassi and R. Schaeffer, Phys. Lett. 26B, 703 (1968); R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A132, 186 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.V. Geramb and K. Amos, Nucl. Phys. A163, 337 (1971); H.V. Geramb, R. Sprickmann, and G. Strobel, Nucl. Phys. A199, 545 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G.R. Satchler and W.G. Love, Phys. Lett. 65B, 415 (1976); W.G. Love, paper at this conference.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Wojciechowski et al., Phys. Rev. C17, 2126 (1978); D. Stanley and F. Petrovich, to be published.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Mahaux, paper at this conference.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F.A. Brieva, paper at this conference.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Vinh Mau, paper at this conference.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Petrovich, Nucl. Phys. A251, 143 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.J. Moffa, C.B. Dover, and J.P. Vary, Phys. Rev. C16, 1857 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Petrovich and D. Stanley, Nucl. Phys. A275, 487 (1977); M.E. Williams-Norton et al., Nucl. Phys. A275, 509 (1977)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W.G. Love, Part. and Nuclei 3, 318 (1972); W.G. Love and L.W. Owen, Nucl. Phys. A239, 74 (1975); W.G. Love, to be published.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Sinha, Phys. Rep. 20C, 1 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.W. Negele and D. Vautherin, Phys. Rev. C5, 1472 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Golin, F. Petrovich, and D. Robson, Phys. Lett. 64B, 253 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Y.C. Tang, paper at this conference.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Kallio and K. Kolltveit, Nucl. Phys. 53, 87 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Moskowski and B. Scott, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 65 (1960).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E.C. Halbert and G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A233, 265 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Scott, N.P. Mathur, and F. Petrovich, Nucl. Phys. A285, 222 (1977)ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. Petrovich et al., Phys. Rev. C16, 839 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    G.E. Brown, Unified Theory of Nuclear Models and Nucleon-Nucleon Forces, 2nd. ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G.R. Satchler, Phys. Lett. 59B, 121 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. Bertsch et al., Nucl. Phys. A284, 399 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Petrovich, D. Stanley, and J.J. Bevelacqua, Phys. Lett. 71B, 259 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Picklesimer and G. Walker, Phys. Rev. C17, 237 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    W.G. Love et al., Phys. Lett. 73B, 277 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    G.R. Hammerstein, R.H. Howell, and F. Petrovich, Nucl. Phys. A213, 45 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    W.G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A192, 49 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    S.A. Moskowski, Phys. Rev. C2, 402 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    W.G. Love, Phys. Lett. 72B, 4 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nucl. Structure (Benjamin, New York, 1969), Vol. I, p. 259.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    G.W. Greenlees, G.J. Pyle and Y.C. Tang, Phys. Rev. 171, 1115 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J.M. Moss et al., Phys. Rev. C6, 1698 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    E. Rost, Phys. Lett. 26B, 184 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    F. Petrovich, in Proc. Int. Symp. on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas, 1978, to be published; J.M. Moss, Phys. Rev. C17, 813 (1978).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    W. Weiss et al., Phys. Lett. 61B, 237 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    F. Petrovich et al., Phys. Rev. C17, 1642 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    L.A. Parks et al., Phys. Lett. 70B, 27 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    G. Tungate, contribution to this conference.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    M. Nagao and Y. Torizuka, Phys. Lett. 37B, 383 (1971)ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    V. Gillet, A. Green, and E. Sanderson, Nucl. Phys. 88, 321 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    P.J. Moffa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 992 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    G.S. Adams, thesis, Indiana University, 1977 (unpublished), available as IUCF Internal Report 77-3.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    F. Petrovich and W.G. Love, Bull. Am Phys. Soc. 23, 963 (1978) and to be published.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    A.D. Bacher et al., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 23, 945 (1978) and to be published.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    J. Friedrich, K. Voegler, and H. Entenaur, Phys. Lett. 64B, 269 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    J. Lichtenstadt, J. Heisenberg, C.N. Papanicolas, C.P. Sargent, A.N. Courtemanche, and J.S. McCarthy, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    W.W. True, C.W. Ma, and W.T. Pinkston, Phys. Rev. C3, 2421 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Petrovich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations