Advertisement

Robust Control pp 210-217 | Cite as

Nash games and mixed H2/H control

  • D. J. N. Limebeer
  • B. D. O. Anderson
  • B. Hendel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 183)

Abstract

The established theory of non-zero sum games is used to solve a mixed H 2/H control problem. Our idea is to use the two pay-off functions associated with a two player Nash game to represent the H 2 and H criteria separately. We treat the state feedback problem, and we find necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a solution. A full stability analysis is available in the infinite horizon case [13], and the resulting controller is a constant state feedback law which is characterised by the solution to a pair of cross-coupled Riccati differential equations.

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Riccati Equation Nash Equilibrium Strategy Nash Solution Nash Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore, “Optimal Control-Linear Quadratic Methods,” Prentice-Hall International, 1989Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Arov and M. G. Krein, “On the evaluation of entropy functionals and their minima in generalized extension problems,” Acta Scienta Math., Vol.45, pp 33–50, 1983, (in Russian)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    T. Basar, “On the uniqueness of the Nash solution in linear-quadratic differential games,” Int. Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 5, pp 65–90, 1977CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Basar and G. J. Olsder, “Dynamic noncooperative game theory,” Academic Press, New York, 1982zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. S. Bernstein and W. M. Haddad, “LQG control with an H performance bound: A Riccati equation approach,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, Vol. AC-34, No. 3, pp 293–305, 1989CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. C. Doyle, K. Zhou and B. Bodenheimer, “Optimal control with mixed H 2 and H performance objectives,” Proc. 1989 American Control Conf., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp 2065–2070, 1989Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. Dym, “J-contractive matrix functions, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and interpolation,” Vol. 71 of Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Am. Math. Soc., 1989Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Dym and I. Gohberg, “A maximum entropy principle for contractive interpolants,” J. Funct. Analysis, Vol.65, pp 83–125, 1986zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    K. Glover and D. Mustafa, “Derivation of the maximum entropy H -controller and a state-space formula for its entropy,” Int. J. Control, Vol.50, pp 899–916, 1989zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    I. M. Jaimoukha and D. J. N. Limebeer, “State-space algorithm for the solution of the 2-block super-optimal distance problem,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Brighton, United Kingdom, 1991Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. Kwakernaak, “A polynomial approach to minimax frequency domain optimisation of multivariable feedback systems,” Int. J. Control, Vol.44, No.1, pp 117–156, 1986zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Kwakernaak and R. Sivan, “Linear optimal control systems,” J. Wiley & son, 1972Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. J. N. Limebeer, B. D. O. Anderson and B. Hendel, “A Nash game approach to mixed H 2/H control,” submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. J. N. Limebeer, G. D. Halikias and K. Glover, “State-space algorithm for the computation of super-optimal matrix interpolating functions,” Int. J. Control, Vol.50, No.6, pp 2431–2466, 1989zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. J. N. Limebeer and Y. S. Hung, “An analysis of the pole-zero cancellations in H -optimal control problems of the first kind,” SIAM J. Control Optimiz., Vol.25, pp 1457–1493, 1987zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. Mustafa, “Relations between maximum entropy H control and combined H /LQG control,” Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 12, pp 193–203, 1989zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. Mustafa and K. Glover, “Minimum entropy H control,” Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1990zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. Mustafa, K. Glover and D. J. N. Limebeer, “Solutions to the H general distance problem which minimize an entropy integral,” Automatica, Vol. 27, pp. 193–199, 1991zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. A. Rotea and P. P. Khargonekar, “H 2-optimal control with an H -constraint—the state feedback case,” Internal Report, Univ. of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. W. Starr and Y. C. Ho, “Nonzero-sum differential games,” J. Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol.3, No. 3, pp 184–206, 1967CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. C. Tsai, D. W. Gu and I. Postlethwaite, “A state space approach to super-optimal H control problems,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, AC-33, No.9, 1988Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    N.J. Young, “The Nevanlinna-Pick problem for matrix-valued functions,” J. Operator Theory, Vol.15, pp239–265, 1986zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    K. Zhou, J. C. Doyle, K. Glover and B. Bodenheimer, “Mixed H 2 and H 8 control,” Proc. 1990 American Control Conf., San Diego, pp 2502–2507, 1990Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. N. Limebeer
    • 1
  • B. D. O. Anderson
    • 2
  • B. Hendel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringImperial CollegeLondon
  2. 2.Department of Systems EngineeringAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations