Skip to main content

Desmeared, slit-smeared and projected SAXS: a comparison of various methods of evaluation for segmented polyurethanes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontiers in Polymer Science

Part of the book series: Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science ((PROGCOLLOID,volume 71))

Abstract

Evaluation methods for X-ray small angle scattering of segmented polyurethane elastomers are discussed using the assumption of isolated, randomly distributed hard segment domains in order to test the reliability of evaluation.

Projection of the intensity distribution onto the meridian of the scattering diagram reduces the analysis to a one-dimensional problem, since the projections is related to a chord through the three-dimensional structure. Furthermore, the chord may be identified with the one-dimensional structure of an ideal lamellar stack, so that the projection of the intensity is comparable with the well-known result of J. J. Hermans for lamellar stacks.

The projection has to be calculated in the three dimensional Fourier space either by desmearing the slit-smeared scattering intensity or by projecting it directly onto the meridian. Practically identical results are obtained by both procedures, so that the desmearing operation may be omitted in the present case. We show that the damping function, which is due to domain boundary diffuseness, can be suitably and directly eliminated from the slit-smeared intensity by applying a method proposed by Koberstein.

A reproducibility of the final structural parameters within 10–15% can be achieved using the methods described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Neumüller W, Bonart R (1982) J Macromol Sci Phys B21(2):203–217

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neumüller W, Bonart R (1984) J Macromol Sci Phys B23(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruland W (1971) J Appl Cryst 4:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonart R, Müller EH (1974) J Macromol Sci Phys B10(1):177–189

    Google Scholar 

  5. Porod G (1951) Koll Z 124:83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mittelbach P, Porod G (1965) Kolloid Z Z Polym 202:40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koberstein JT, Morra B, Stein RS (1980) J Appl Cryst 13:34–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vonk CG (1973) J Appl Cyrst 6:81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koberstein JT, Stein RS (1983) J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed 21:1439–1472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koberstein JT, Stein RS (1983) J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed 21:2181–2200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermans JJ (1944) Rec Trav Chim Pays-Bas 63:5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hosemann R (1949) Z Phys 127:16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruland W (1977) Coll & Polym Sci 255:417–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Strobl GR (1970) Acta Cryst A26:367

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neumüller W (1982) Röntgenkleinwinkeluntersuchungen an segmentierten Polyurethanen, Dissertation, Regensburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

W. Wilke

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. H.-G. Kilian on the occasion of his 60th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meyer, H., Bonart, R. (1985). Desmeared, slit-smeared and projected SAXS: a comparison of various methods of evaluation for segmented polyurethanes. In: Wilke, W. (eds) Frontiers in Polymer Science. Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science, vol 71. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0114021

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0114021

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-0691-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1698-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics