Advertisement

Identification for control — What is there to learn?

  • Lennart Ljung
Part C Modeling, Identification And Estimation
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 241)

Abstract

This paper reviews some issues in system identification that are relevant for building models to be used for control design. We discuss how to concentrate the fit to important frequency ranges, and how to determine which these are. Iterative and adaptive approaches are put into this framework, as well as model validation. Particular attention is paid to the presentation and visualization of the results of residual analysis.

Keywords

Model Validation Adaptive Control Closed Loop Control Design Model Residual 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    N.R. Draper and H. Smith. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 1981.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    U. Forsell and L. Ljung. Closed-loop identification revisited. Technical report, Dept of Electrical Engineering, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Gevers. Towards a Joint Design of Identification and Control. In H. L. Trentelman and J. C. Willems, editors, Essays on Control: Perspectives in the Theory and its Applications, pages 111–151. Birkhäuser, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G.C. Goodwin and K.S. Sin. Adaptive Filtering, Prediction and Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    I. Gustavsson, L. Ljung, and T. Söderström. Identification of processes in closed loop — identification and accuracy aspects. Automatica, 13:59–77, 1977.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Hjalmarsson, M. Gevers, and F. De Bruyne. For model-based control design, closed loop identification gives better performance. Automatica, 32, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. Hjalmarsson, S. Gunnarsson, and M. Gevers. Optimality and suboptimality of iterative identification and control schemes. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pages 2559–2563, Seattle, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. A. Ioannou and J. Sun. Robust Adaptive Control. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.L. Kosut, M.K. Lau, and S.P. Boyd. Set-membership identification of systems with parametric and nonparametric uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 37(7):929–942, 1992.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    W. S. Lee, B. D. O. Anderson, I. M. Y. Mareels, and R. L. Kosut. On some key issues in the windsurfer approach to adaptive robust control. Automatica, 31(11):1619–1636, 1995.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. S. Lee, B. D. O. Andersson, R. L. Kosut, and I. M. Y. Mareels. On Robust Performance Improvement through The Windsurfer Approach to Adaptive Robust Control. In Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 2821–2827, San Antonio, TX, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    L. Ljung. System Identification — Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1987.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    L. Ljung and T. Söderström. Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. MIT press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    L. Ljung and L. Guo. The role of model validation for assessing the size of the unmodeled dynamics. IEEE Trans. Autom Control, Vol AC-42(9):1230–1239, 1997.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. M. Maciejowski. Multivariable Feedback Design. Electronic Systems Engineering Series. Addison-Wesley, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Poolla, P. P. Khargonokar, A. Tikku, J. Krause, and K. Nagpal. A time-domain approach to model validation. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, AC-39:951–059, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. J. P. Schrama. Accurate models for control design: the necessity of an iterative scheme. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37:991–994, 1992.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R.S. Smith and J.C. Doyle. Model invalidation: A connection between robust control and identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 37:942–952, July 1992.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    K. J. Åström and T. Hägglund. Automatic Tuning of PID Regulators. Instrument Society of America, Triangle Research Park, N.C., 1988.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    K.J. Åström and B. Wittenmark. Adaptive Control. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Z. Zang, R. R. Bitmead, and M. Gevers. Iterative Weighted Leastsquares Identification and Weighted LQG Control Design. Automatica, 31(11):1577–1594, 1995.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lennart Ljung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations