Abstract
This article summarizes the nonlinear optical methods allowing one to perform optical phase conjugation, i. e. spatial-phase reversal of an incoming electromagnetic wave. Special attention is given to the most powerful technique—to date—which is based on degenerate four-wave mixing (DFWM). One discusses the physical processes (one-photon and two-photon resonances) responsible for DFWM. The generation of light-induced Bragg gratings, and the analogy with real-time holography are emphasized, with a brief review of the applications in adaptive optics and imaging (wavefront rectification, etc.). Also described are the spectroscopic applications of DFWM (transient gratings, Doppler-free emission in gases, high-frequency heterodyne spectroscopy), the polarization properties of phase-conjugate mirrors, and the operation of phase-conjugate resonators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B. I. Stepanov, E. V. Ivakin and A. S. Rubanov; Sov. Phys. Dokl. 16, 46 (1971).
J. P. Woerdman, Opt. Comm. 2, 212 (1970).
B. Ya. Zel'Dovich, V. I. Popovichev, V. V. Ragul'skii and F. S. Faizullov, JETP Letters, 15, 109 (1972); 16, 435 (1972).
R. W. Hellwarth, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 67, 1 (1977).
For reviews on various aspects of phase-conjugation, see: A. Yariv, I. E. E. E. Quant. Electron. QE 14, 650 (1978); B. Ya. Zel'Dovich, N.F. Pilipetskii and V.V. Skunov, Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 8, 1021 (1978); C. R. Giuliano, Physics Today (April 1981); D. M. Pepper, Laser Focus (January 1982).
H. H. Barett and S. F. Jacobs, Opt. Letters 4, 190 (1979).
V. Wang and C. R. Giuliano, Opt. Lett. 2, 158 (1978).
M. Slatkine, I. J. Bigio, B. J. Feldman and R. A. Fischer, Opt. Lett. 7, 108 (1982), M. C. Gower and R. G. Garo, Opt. Lett. 7, 162 (1982).
A. Yariv, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 301 (1976); Appl. Phys. Lett. 28, 88 (1976).
P. Avizonis et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 435 (1977).
N. Bloembergen, Nonlinear Optics (Benjamin, New York, 1965).
D. Bloch and M. Ducloy, J. Phys. B.: At. Mol. Phys. 14, L 471 (1981).
A. Yariv and D. M. Pepper, Opt. Lett. 1, 16 (1977).
D. M. Pepper and R. L. Abrams, Opt. Lett. 3, 212 (1978).
S. L. Jensen and R. W. Hellwarth, Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 166 (1978); D. M. Bloom and G. C. Bjorklund, ibid,, 31, 592 (1977).
[16]Exhautive lists of materials and laser wavelengths used in DFWM are given in Ref. [5].
See, e g., N. Bloembergen and M. D. Levenson in High Resolution Laser Spectroscopy, p. 315 (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1976).
A. Yariv, Opt. Commun 25, 23 (1978).
J. Huignard, J. P. Herriau, P. Aubourg and E. Spitz, Opt. Lett. 4, 21 (1979).
Note that, in general, the crystal response is non-local, i.e. there is a spatial phase-mismatch between the incident light fringes and the induced index grating. This mismatch is particularly important in Two-wave mixing experiments, and may produce an energy transfer between the two writing beams. See. e. g. D. L. Staebler and J. J. Amodei, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 1042 (1972); V. L. Vinetskii, N. V. Kukhtarev, S. G. Odulov, and M. S. Soskin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 22, 742 (1979); also, Ferroelectrics 22, 961 (1979).
A. Marrakchi, J. P. Huignard and J. P. Herriau, Opt. Commun. 34, 15 (1980).
J. P. Huignard and J. P. Herriau, Appl. Opt. 16, 1807, 2796 (1977).
J. P. Huignard and J. P. Herriau, Appl. Opt. 17, 2671 (1978); J. Feinberg, Opt. Lett. 5, 330 (1980).
J. White and A. Yariv, Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 5 (1980).
H. J. Eichler: in Festkörperprobleme (Advances in Solid State Physics), Vol XVIII p. 241 J. Treusch (ed), Vieweg, Braunschweig 1979.
J. Hegarty, D. M. Sturge, A. C. Gossard and W. Wiegmann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 40 132 (1982).
G. Martin and R. W. Hellwarth, Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 371 (1979).
P. F. Liao and D. M. Bloom, Opt. Lett. 3, 4 (1978); also H. I. Mandelberg, Opt. Lett, 5, 258 (1980).
K. Yamada, Y. Fukuda and T. Hashi, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 50, 592 (1981).
M. Ducloy and D. Bloch, J. Phys. (Paris) 42, 711 (1981).
S. M. Wandzura, Opt. Lett. 4, 208 (1979).
R. K. Jain, M. B. Klein and R. C. Lind, Opt. Lett. 4, 328 (1979).
L. M. Humphrey, J. P. Gordon and P. F. Liao, Opt. Lett. 5, 56 (1980).
For instance in resonant gases, the DFWM reflectivity may vary by seven orders of magnitude between θ=0 and θ=π/2 (See Ref. [30], p. 715).
P. F. Liao, D. M. Bloom and N. P. Economou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 813 (1978).
D. G. Steel and J. F. Lam, Opt. Comm. 40, 77 (1981); P. Aubourg et al., Opt. Lett. 6, 383 (1981).
D. Bloch, R. K. Laj, K. S. Leng and M. Ducloy, Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.
M. Ducloy, R. K. Raj and D. Bloch, Opt. Lett. 7, 60 (1982).
M. Kroll, Opt. Lett. 7, 151 (1982).
T. Fu and M. Sargent III, Opt. Lett. 4, 366 (1979).
J. Nilsen and A. Yariv, Appl. Opt. 18, 143 (1979); J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 180 (1981); Opt. Lett. 6, 380 (1981).
R. L. Abrams and R. C. Lind, Opt. Lett. 2, 94 (1978); 3, 235 (1978).
D. Block, R. K. Raj, J. J. Snyder and M. Ducloy, J. Phys. Lett. (Paris) 42, L 31 (1981).
This behavior of XNL has been inferred by J. P. Woerdman and M.F.H. Schuurmans [Opt. Lett. 6, 239 (1981)] from a simplified model based on the nonlinear response of stationary two-level atoms to a single plane wave. On the opposite an exact density-matrix calculation (D. Bloch and M. Ducloy, to be published) shows both the eminent role played by the velocity distribution in the behavior of the nonlinear susceptibility, and the quite distinct effects of the saturation induced by either pump wave (directional anisotropy). (See Ref. [37].)
M. Ducloy and D. Bloch, J. Phys. (Paris) 43, 57 (1982).
R. K. Raj, D. Bloch, J. J. Snyder, G. Camy and M. Ducloy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1251 (1980).
D. Bloch, These de Troisieme Cycle (Universite Paris-Nord, 1980).
R. K. Raj, These d'Universite (Universite Paris-Nord, 1980).
See, e g., V. S. Letokhov and V. P. Chebotayev, Nonlinear Laser Spectroscopy, Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Vol. 4 (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1977).
D. Bloch, R. K. Raj and M. Ducloy, Opt. Comm. 37, 183 (1981).
C. Aminoff and M. Pinard, J. Phys. (Paris) 43, 263 (1982).
D. Bloch, R. K. Raj, E. Giacobino and M. Ducloy, communication to the First European Conference on Atomic Physics, Abstract V 3 (Heidelberg, April 1981).
J. Snyder R. K. Raj, E. Bloch and M. Ducloy, Opt. Lett. 5, 163 (1980)
J. L. Hall, L. Hollberg, T. Baer and H. G. Robinson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 680 (1981); G.C. Bjorklund, Opt. Lett. 5, 15 (1980).
G. Camy, C. J. Borde and M. Ducloy, Opt. Commun. 41, 325 (1982).
D. Bloch, M. Ducloy and E. Giacobino, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 14, L 819 (1981).
M. Matsuoka, Opt. Commun. 15, 84 (1975).
D. C. Haueisen, Opt. Commun. 28, 183 (1978).
T. Fu and M. Sargent, Opt. Lett. 5, 433 (1980); also G. Agrawal, Opt. Commun. 39, 272 (1981).
P. F. Liao, N. P. Economou and R. R. Freeman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1473 (1977).
D. G. Steel and J. F. Lam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1588 (1979).
In anisotropic solids, polarization selection rules depend on the peculiar, symmetry order of the solid. In the nonlinear process, the solid may globally acquire a non-zero angular momentum, i.e. a torque is exerted on it. See. e. g. N. Bloembergen, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1429 (1980) and references therein.
R. K. Raj, D. Bloch and M. Ducloy, to be published.
J. F. Lam, D. G. Steel, R. A. McFarlane and R. C. Lind, Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 977 (1981).
S. N. Jabr, L. K. Lam and R. W. Hellwarth, Phys. Rev. A 24, 3264 (1981).
One predicts that for J→J transitions, C=(J−1) (J+2)/(3J2+3J−1) and for J→J+1 transitions, C=−J(2J+4)/(4J2+8J+5). (Refs. [38], [63].)
D.S. Hamilton, D. Heiman, J. Feinberg and R. W. Hellwarth, Opt. Lett. 4, 124 (1979).
G. Martin, L. K. Lam and R. W. Hellwarth, Opt. Lett. 5, 185 (1980); see also B. Ya Zel'dovich and V. V. Shkunov, Sov. J. Quantum Electron 9, 379 (1979)
I. M. Bel'Dyugin, M. G. Galushkin and E. M. Zemskov, Sov. J. Quantum Electron 9, 20, 1198 (1979).
J. Auyeng, D. Fekete, D. M. Pepper and A. Yariv, IEEE J. Quantum Electron QE-15, 1180 (1979).
J. F. Lam and W. P. Brown, Opt. Lett. 5, 61 (1980).
P. A. Belanger, A. Hardy and A. E. Siegman, Appl. Opt. 19, 602 (1980).
R. C. Lind and D. G. Steel, Opt. Lett. 6, 554 (1981).
J. Feinberg and R. W. Hellwarth, Opt. Lett. 5, 319 (1980).
J. O. White, M. Cronin-Golomb, B. Fischer and A. Yariv, Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 450 (1982).
Nonlinear optical phase, conjugation, edited by R.A. Fischer, (Academic Press, 1982, to be published).
C. Flytzanis and C. L. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 441 (1980); G.P. Agrawal and C. Flytzanis, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-17, 374 (1981).
H. G. Winful and J. H. Marburger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 613 (1980).
A. Borshch, M. Brodin, V. Volkov, and N. Kukhtarev, Opt. Commun. 35, 287 (1980); 41, 213 (1982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ducloy, M. (1982). Nonlinear optical phase conjugation. In: Grosse Aachen, P. (eds) Festkörperprobleme 22. Advances in Solid State Physics, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0107934
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0107934
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-528-08028-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75370-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive