Progress in integrated fluid/structure/controls computations using high fidelity equations

  • Guru P. Guruswamy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 490)


The progress made in multidisciplinary computations using high-fidelity flow and structural equation is summarized. Given the power of super computers it has been demonstrated that it is practical to use high fidelity equations to accurately model aeroelasticity associated with complex flows involving shock-waves, vortices and separation. It is observed that most of the progress made is based on the domain decomposition approach that uses finite-difference schemes for fluids and finite element schemes for structures. High end applications of technology to areas such as active controls are discussed.


Transonic Flow Flutter Speed Domain Decomposition Approach Control Surface Deflection Unsteady Flow Computation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beam R. and Warming R.F. “An Implicit Finite-Difference Algorithm for Hyperbolic Systems in Conservative Law Form,” Jl of Computational Physics, Vol. 22, No. 9 Sept 1976, pp 87–110.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Obayashi, S., Guruswamy, G.P., and Goorjian, P.M., “Streamwise Upwind Algorithm for Computing Unsteady Transonic Flows Past Oscillating Wings,” AIAA J, Vol. 29, Oct. 91.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guruswamy, G. P. “Unsteady Aerodynamic and aeroelastic Calculations for Wings Using Euler Equations,” AIAA J., Vol 28, No. 461, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guruswamy, G.P. “Vortical Flow Computations on a Flexible Blended Wing-Body Configuration,” AIAA J, Vol. 30, No. 10, October 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holst, T.L, Flores, J., Kaynak, U., and Chaderjian, N., “Navier-Stokes Computations, Including a Full F-16 Aircraft,” Chap 21, Applied Computational Aerodynamics, edited by P. A. Henne, Vol. 125, Prog. in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, ISBN 0-930403-69-X, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guruswamy, P. and Yang, T.Y., “Aeroelastic Time Response Analysis of Thin Airfoils by Transonic Code LTRAN2,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 9, No. 4, Dec. 80.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borland, C.J. and Rizzetta, D., “XTRAN3S—Transonic Steady and Unsteady Aerodynamics for Aeroelastic Applications, Vol I—Theoretical Manual,” AFWAL-TR-80-3107, Dec. 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guruswamy, G.P., Goorjian, P.M., and Merritt, F. J., “ATRAN3S—An Unsteady Transonic Code for Clean Wings,“ NASA TM 86783, Dec. 1985.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Batina, J.T., Bennett, R.M., Seidal, D.A., Cunningham, S.R., and Bland, S.R., “Recent Advances in Transonic Computational Aeroelasticity,“ NASA TM 100663, Sept. 1988.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guruswamy, G.P., “ENSAERO-A Multidisciplinary Program for Fluid/Structural Interaction Studies of Aerospace Vehicles,“ Computing Systems Engg., Vol. 1, Nos. 2–4, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Byun, C. and Guruswamy, G. P., “A Comparative Study of Serail and Parallel Aeroelastic Computations of Wings,“ NASA TM 108805 Jan 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Obayashi S. and Guruswamy, G.P. “Convergence Acceleration of a Navier-Stokes Solver for Efficient Static Aeroelastic Computations,“ AIAA J, Vol 33, No 6, June 95.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guruswamy, G.P., “Interaction of Fluids and Structures for Aircraft Applications,“ Computers and Strctures, Vol 10, No. 1/2 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guruswamy, G. P. “User's Guide for ENSAERO-A Multidisciplinary Program for Fluid/Structural/Control Interaction Studies of Aircraft (Release 1),“ NASA TM 108853, Oct 94.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yeh, D.T. et al.. “Numerical Study of the X-31 High Angle-of-Attack Flow Characteristics,“ AIAA-91-1630, June 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farhangnia, M., Guruswamy, G. P and Biringen, S. “Transonic-Buffet Associated Aeroelasticity of a Supercritical Wing,“ AIAA 96-0286, Jan 96.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guruswamy, G.P. and Byun, C. “Fluid-Structural Interactions Using Navier-Stokes Flow Equations Coupled with Shell Finite Element Structures,“ AIAA-93-3087, July 93.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Obayashi, S. and Guruswamy, G.P. ”Navier-Stokes Computations for Oscillating Control Surfaces,“ Jl of Aircraft, Vol 31, No. 3 May–June 94.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yeh, D.T. “Aeroelastic Analysis of a Hinged-Flap and Control Effectiveness Using Navier-Stokes Equations,“, AIAA-95-2263, June 1995.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tu, E. L, “Navier-Stokes Simulation ofvthe Canard-Wing-Body Logitudinal Dynamic Stabilty Characteristics,“ AIAA-94-1901, June 94.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Appa, K. and Guruswamy, G.P., “Aircraft Dynamics and Loads Computations Using CFD Methods,“ AIAA-96-1342 April 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guru P. Guruswamy
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Computational Aerodynamics Branch, MS 258-1NASA Ames Research CenterMoffett Field

Personalised recommendations