Advertisement

Multidisciplinary control design for a two-dimensional airfoil with jets

  • Brian G. Allan
  • Andy Packard
  • Maurice Holt
Algorithms Numerical Techniques
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 490)

Abstract

Numerical simulation of a two-dimensional airfoil controlled by jets near the trailing edge is investigated. This simulation couples the Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes equations with Euler’s equations of rigid-body motion and an active control system. Robust control design techniques were used to develop a controller for tracking altitude commands. Simulation of the controller with the coupled system showed good tracking performance for a step input command in altitude. However, the linear model was unable to capture the nonlinear nature of this system producing mild oscillations in the attitude, pitch rate, and vertical velocity of the airfoil.

Keywords

Mass Flow Rate AIAA Paper Robust Controller Performance Weight Pitch Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Atwood, C.A., and Van Dalsem, W.R., “Flowfield Simulation about the SOFIA Airborne Observatory,” AIAA J. of Aircraft, Sep. 1993, pp. 719–727.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Chawla, K. and Van Dalsem, W.R., “Numerical Simulation of a Powered-Lift Landing,” 72nd Fluid Dynamics Panel Meeting and Symposium on Computational and Experimental Assessment of Jets in Cross Flow, Winchester, U.K., April 19–23, 1993. AGARD Conference Proceedings CP-534, pp. 32.1–32.10.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Meakin, R.L., “Overset Grid Methods for Aerodynamic Simulation of Bodies in Relative Motion,” 8th Aircraft/Stores Compatibility Symposium, Oct. 1990.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Atwood, C.A., “Computation of a Controlled Store Separation from a Cavity,” AIAA Paper 94-0031, Jan. 1994.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Allan, B.G., Atwood, C.A. and Packard, A., “Control System Analysis in Nonlinear Flight Regimes,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, Aug. 1994. AIAA Paper 94–3544.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Pulliam, T.H. and Chaussee, D.S., “A Diagonal Form of an Implicit Approximate-Factorization Algorithm,” J. Comp. Phys. Vol. 39, Feb. 1981, pp. 347–363.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Steger, J.L., Dougherty, F.C., and Benek, J.A., “A Chimera Grid Scheme,” Advances in Grid Generation, K.N. Ghia and U. Ghia, eds., ASME FED-Vol. 5., June 1983.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Meakin, R., “Moving Body Overset Grid Methods for Complete Aircraft Tiltrotor Simulations,” AIAA Paper 93–3350, July 1993.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Steinbrenner, J.P., Chawner, J.R., and Fouts, C.L., “A Structured Approach to Interactive Multiple Block Grid Generation,” AGARD FDP Specialists Mtg. on Mesh Generation for Complex Three-Dimensional Configurations, Loen, Norway, May 1989.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Chan, W.M. and Steger, J.L., “Enhancements of a Three-Dimensional Hyperbolic Grid Generation Scheme,” App. Math. and Comp., Vol. 51, pp. 181–205.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Meakin, R.L., “A New Method for Establishing Inter-Grid Communication Among Systems of Overset Grids,” AIAA Paper 91–1586, June 1991.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Meakin, R.L., “Computations of the Unsteady Flow About a Generic Wing/Pylon/Finned-Store Configuration,” AIAA Paper 92–4568, Aug. 1992.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Packard, A., Doyle, J., and Balas, G., “Linear, Multivariable Robust Control with a μ Perspective,” ASME Trans. J. of Dynamic System, Measurement, and Control, Vol 155, June 1993, pp. 426–437.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian G. Allan
    • 1
  • Andy Packard
    • 1
  • Maurice Holt
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations