Quantum Groups pp 341-349 | Cite as

Invariants of 3-Manifolds based on conformal field theory and Heegaard splitting

  • Toshitake Kohno
III. Quantum Groups, Low-Dimensional Topology And Link Invariants
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 1510)


Conform Block Conformal Dimension Conformal Field Theory Fusion Rule Mapping Class Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    L. Alvarez-Gaumé, G. Sierra and C. Gomez, Topics in conformal field theory, Physics and Mathematics of Strings, World Scientific (1990), 16–111.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. Crane, Topology of 3-manifolds and conformal field theories, preprint, Yale University (1989).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. E. Capell, R. Lee and E. Y. Miller, Invariants of 3-manifolds from conformal field theory, preprint (1990).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Gocho, The topological invariant of three-manifolds based on the U(1) gauge theory, preprint, University of Tokyo (1990).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Humphries, Generators for the mapping class group, LNM, Springer (1979), 44–47.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    V. G. Kac and D. H. Peterson, Infinite dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms, Advances in Math. 53 (1984), 125–264.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Kirby and P. Melvin, Evalutions of the 3-manifold invariants of Witten and Reshetikhin-Turaev, London Math. Soc. Lect. Notes Series 151 (1990), 101–114.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. N. Kirillov and N. Y. Reshetikhin, Representation of the algebra U q (sl(2, C), q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links, Infinite dimensional Lie algebras and groups, World Scientific (1988), 285–342.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    V. G. Knizhnik and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Current algebra and Wess-Zumino models in two dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B247 (1984), 83–103.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Kohno, Topological invariants for 3-manifolds using representations of mapping class groups, to appear in Topology.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Li and M. Yu, Braiding matrices, modular transformations and topological field theories in 2+1 dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 127 (1990), 195–224.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Moore and N. Seiberg, Classical and quantum conformal field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 123 (1989), 177–254.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Kobayashi, H. Murakami and J. Murakami, Cyclotomic invariants for links, Proc. Japan Acad. 64 (1988), 235–238.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. Murakami and M. Okada, talk at Waseda University, Dec. 1990.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Ohtsuki, private communication.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    N. Y. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Invent. Math 103 (1991), 547.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Tsuchiya and Y. Kanie, Vertex operators in conformal field theory on P 1 and monodromy representations of braid groups, Advanced Studies in Pure Math. 16 (1988), 297–372.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. G. Turaev and O. Y. Viro, State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols, preprint, LOMI (1990).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989), 351–399.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshitake Kohno
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations