Skip to main content

Generalized rules for quantifiers and the completeness of the intuitionistic operators &, ν, ⊃, λ, ∀, ε

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computation and Proof Theory

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNM,volume 1104))

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a proof-theoretic framework for the treatment of arbitrary quantifiers binding m variables in n formulas. In particular, we motivate a schema for introduction and elimination rules for such quantifiers based on a concept of ‘derivation’ that allows rules as assumptions which may be discharged. With respect to this schema, the system of the standard operators of intuitionistic quantifier logic turns out to be complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Beeson, Recursive Models for Constructive Set Theories, Annals of Mathematical Logic 23 (1982), 127–178.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B. R. Boričić, Prilog teoriji intermedijalnih iskaznih logika, Dissertation, Beograd 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Borkowski, On Proper Quantifiers I, Studia Logica 8 (1958), 65–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Došen, Logical Constants. An Essay in Proof Theory, Dissertation, Oxford 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Došen, Sequent-Systems for Modal Logic (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Dummett, Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Gentzen, Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen, Mathematische Zeitschrift 39 (1935), 176–210, 405–431.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Kalish and R. Montague, Logic. Techniques of Formal Reasoning, New York 1964.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. F. v. Kutschera, Ein verallgemeinerter Widerlegungsbegriff für Gentzenkalküle, Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung 12 (1969), 104–118.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Lorenzen, Einfürung in die operative Logik und Mathematik, Berlin 1955, 2nd edition 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Martin-Löf, Constructive Mathematics and Computer Programming. In: L. J. Cohen, J. Los, H. Pfeiffer and K. P. Podewski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI, Amsterdam 1982, 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Prawitz, Angående konstruktiv logik och implikationsbegreppet. In: Sju filosofiska studier tillägnade Anders Wedberg, Stockholm 1963, 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Prawitz, Natural Deduction. A Proof-Theoretical Study, Stockholm 1965.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Prawitz, Towards a Foundation of a General Proof Theory, In: P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Joja, G. C. Moisil (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, Amsterdam 1973, 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Prawitz, Remarks on Some Approaches to the Concept of Logical Consequence (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. A. Schmidt, Mathematische Gesetze der Logik I. Vorlesungen über Aussagenlogik, Berlin 1960.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Schroeder-Heister, Untersuchungen zur regellogischen Deutung von Aussagenverknüpfungen, Dissertation, Bonn 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Schroeder-Heister, A Natural Extension of Natural Deduction (to appear in The Journal of Symbolic Logic).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. J. Shoesmith and T. J. Smiley, Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. I. Zucker and R. S. Tragesser, The Adequacy Problem for Inferential Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1978), 501–516.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Egon Börger Walter Oberschelp Michael M. Richter Brigitta Schinzel Wolfgang Thomas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schroeder-Heister, P. (1984). Generalized rules for quantifiers and the completeness of the intuitionistic operators &, ν, ⊃, λ, ∀, ε. In: Börger, E., Oberschelp, W., Richter, M.M., Schinzel, B., Thomas, W. (eds) Computation and Proof Theory. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 1104. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0099494

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0099494

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-13901-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39119-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics