Skip to main content

Unification of supervised and unsupervised training

  • Plasticity Phenomena (Maturing, Learning & Memory)
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 514 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1606))

Abstract

This paper analyzed several commonly used supervised and unsupervised training algorithms and discusses how they can be unified into a unique training algorithms.

The rationale of this work is to use a traditional gradient descent algorithm, for supervised training, while, for unsupervised training, to self-compute a target vector, in an unsupervised fashion, to be applied then to a supervised algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Haykin, “Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation”, Mc Millan College Publishing Company, New York, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Q. Zhang, “Using Wavelet Networks in Non-parametric Estimation”, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, Vol. 8, No. 2, March 1997, pp. 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Wang, “Adaptive Fuzzy Systems and Control”, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.J. Ross, “Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications”, chapte 11, McGraw Hill, New York, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J.S. Roger Jang, C.T. Sun, “Functional Equivalence Between Radial Basis Function Networks and Fuzzy Inference Systems”, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, Vol. 4, no. 1, January 1993, pp. 156–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L.M. Reyneri, “Unification of Neural and Fuzzy Computing Paradigms”, Proc. of 1-st Int’s Symposium on Neuro-Fuzzy Systems, AT 96, Lausanne (CH), August 1996, sect. 2-Tutorials.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.M. Reyneri, “Unification of Neural and Wavelet Networks and Fuzzy Systems”, to be published in IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K.J. Hunt, R. Haas, R. Murray Smith, “Extending the Functional Equivalence of Radial Basic Function Networks and Fuzzy Inference Systems”, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, Vol. 7, no. 3, may 1996, pp. 776–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Takagi, M. Sugeno, “A New Approach to the Design of Fuzzy Controllers”, Advance in Fuzzy Sets, Possibility Theory, and Applications, P. Wang and S. Chang eds.), Plenum, New York, 1983, pp. 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Benitez, J.L. Castro, I. Requena, “Are Artificial Neural Networks Black Boxes”, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, Vol. 8, no. 5, September 1997, pp. 1156–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Colla, L.M. Reyneri, M. Sgarbi, “Parametric Characterization of Jominy Profiles in Steel Industry by Means of Wavelet and Neural Networks”, to be printed in Journal Integrated Computer Aided Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Sudkamp, R.J. Hammell, II, “Interpolation Completion and Learning Fuzzy Rules”, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 24, 1994, pp. 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Chen, C.F.N. Cowan, P.M. Grant, “Orthogonal least Squares Learning Algorithm for Radial Basis Function Networks”, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, Vol. 2, March 1991, pp. 302–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L.M. Reyneri, E. Filippi, “An Analysis on the Performance of Silicon Implementations of Backpropagation Algorithms for Artificial Neural Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, special issue on Artificial Neural Networks, Vol. 40, no. 12, December 1991, pp. 1380–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.M. Reyneri, M. Sgarbi, “Performance of Weighted Radial Function Classifiers”, in Proc. of ESANN 97, Bruges (B), April 1997, pp. 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Colla, M. Sgarbi, L.M. Reyneri “A Comparison Between Weighted Radial Basic Functions Networks and Wavelet Networks”, in Proc. of ESANN 98, Bruges (B), April 1998, pp. 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

José Mira Juan V. Sánchez-Andrés

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reyneri, L.M. (1999). Unification of supervised and unsupervised training. In: Mira, J., Sánchez-Andrés, J.V. (eds) Foundations and Tools for Neural Modeling. IWANN 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1606. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0098203

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0098203

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66069-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48771-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics