Consistency of positive partition theorems for graphs and models

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 1401)


Regular Cardinal Measurable Cardinal Force Notion Partition Relation Inaccessible Cardinal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A. Hajnal and P. Komjath, Embedding graphs and colored graphs.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Shelah, Notes on combinatorial set theory. Israel J. Math. 14 (1973) 262–277.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Shelah, Was Sierpinski right? I. Israel J. Math. 62 (1988) 355–380.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Shelah, Was Sierpinski right ? II. Preprint.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Nesestril and V. Rodl, Partition (Ramsey) theory, a survey. Colloq. Math. Soc. Janos Bolyai, Vol. 18, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), 75–192.Google Scholar
  6. [Sh95]
    S. Shelah, Canonization theorems and applications, J. of Symb. Logic 40 (1981) 345–353.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [EHMR]
    P. Erdos, A. Hajnal, A. Mate and R. Rado, Combinatorial Set Theory: Partition relations for cardinals. Disquisitiones Mathematicae Hungaricae 13, Akademiai Kiado Budapest, 1984, North Holland.Google Scholar
  8. [Sc Sh20]
    J. Schmerl and S. Shelah, On power-like models of hyperinaccessible cardinals, J. of Symb. Logic 37 (1972) 531–537.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of MathematicsThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations