Skip to main content

DODDLE: A domain ontology rapid development environment

  • Knowledge Management (Ontology, Individual and Collective Knowledge)
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1531))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper focuses on how to construct domain ontologies, in particular, a hierarchically structured set of domain concepts without concept definitions, reusing a machine readable dictionary (MRD) and making it adjusted to specific domains. In doing so, we must deal with concept drift, which means that the senses of concepts change depending on application domains. So here are presented the following two strategies: match result analysis and trimmed result analysis. The strategies try to identify which part may stay or should be moved, analyzing spell match results between given input domain terms and a MRD. We have done case studies in the filed of some law. The empirical results show us that our system can support a user in constructing a domain ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Aoki, M. Kurematsu and T. Yamaguchi (1996). LODE:A Legal Ontology Development Environment: Proc. PKAW’96, pp. 190–209.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.J. Brachman, A.Borgida, D.L.McGuinness, P.F.Patel-Schneider, and L.A. Resnick. The CLASSIC knowledge representation system, or, KL-ONE, the next generation: Proc. the International Conference on Fifth Generation Systems, pp. 1036–1043, Tokyo, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Breuker and W. Van de Velde. Common KADS Library for Expertise Modeling: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bylander, T. & Chandrasekaran, B. (1988). Generic Tasks in Knowledge-based Reasoning: The “Right” Level of Abstraction for Knowledge Acquisition. In Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Vol. 1, ed. B. Gaines & J. Boose, 65–77. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Japan Electronic Dictionary Research Institute LTD.(1993). EDR Electronic Dictionary Technical Guide: Japan Electronic Dictionary Research Institute LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber, T.R. (1992). Ontolingua: A Mechanism to Support Portable Ontologies: Technical Report, KSL 91-66, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Uschold and M. Gruninger (1996). Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications: AAAI-96 tutorial syllabus. SA1, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heijst, G. (1995). The Role of Ontologies in Knowledge Engineering: Ph.D. diss., University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Genesereth, M.R. and Fikes, R. (1992). Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0 Reference Manual: Technical Report, Logic-92-1, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.V. Guha and D.B. Lenat (1990). Cyc: A Mid-term Report: AI Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 32–59.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Knight, S. Luk (1994). Building a Large Knowledge Base for Machine Translation: Proc. AAAI-94. Seattle, WA. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, G. (1990). WordNet An on-line lexical database: International Journal of Lexicographer 3(4) (Special Issue).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kahn, G., Nowlan, S. & McDermott, J. (1985). MORE: An Intelligent Knowledge Acquisition Tool: Proc. the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 581–584. Los Angeles: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robert M. MacGregor (1991). The evolving technology of classification—based knowledge representation systems: Principles of semantic networks: explorations in the representation of knowledge, John F. Sowa, ed., The Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA, 385–400

    Google Scholar 

  15. Musen, M.A., Gennari, J.H., Eriksson, H., Tu, S.W., and Puerta, A.R. (1994). PROTÉGÉ-II: Computer Support For Development Of Intelligent Systems. Genesereth, M.R. & Fikes, R. 1992. Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0 Reference Manual: Technical Report. KSL-94-60, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peiwei Mi and Walt Scacchi. A Knowledge-Based Environment for Modeling and Simulating Software Engineering Processes: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 3:283–294 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Sono and M. Yamate (1993). United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods: Seirin Shoin.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bill Swartout, Ramesh Patil, Kevin Knight and Tom Russ (1996). Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies: Proc. of the 10th Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (KAW’96).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hing-Yan Lee Hiroshi Motoda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sekiuchi, R., Aoki, C., Kurematsu, M., Yamaguchi, T. (1998). DODDLE: A domain ontology rapid development environment. In: Lee, HY., Motoda, H. (eds) PRICAI’98: Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1531. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095269

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095269

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65271-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49461-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics