Software process technologies and the competitiveness challenge
- 118 Downloads
Competitive quality is a need for the progress of the Information Technology sector. For enterprises, process is the starting point of all the approaches in the achievement of competitive quality. Despite these widely accepted hypotheses, we fail to demonstrate that Software Process Technologies are really adopted by enterprises. In this position paper we want to stimulate the discussion about the practical adoption of process technologies proposing two issues. First, following the demand for quality, work in the field of process technologies must be directly addressed to quality achievement. Second, if we want to “sell” process technologies, we have to propose to enterprises an incremental approach that minimises investments and promises quality results in the short term.
KeywordsProject Quality Enterprise Process Promise Quality Competitive Quality Quality Achievement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.President's Information Technology Advisory Committee, “Information Technology Research: Investing in Our Future, Report to the President”, February 1999.Google Scholar
- 2.“ISO 9000 revisions”, ISO News, Vol. 8, No. 3, May/June 1999.Google Scholar
- 3.W.S. Humphrey, “Managing the software process”, Addison-Wesley, 1989.Google Scholar
- 4.“ISO/IEC TR 15504:1998 Information technology-Software process assessment-Parts 1–9”, International Organisation for Standardisation, 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.R. Conradi, A. Fuggetta, M.L. Jaccheri, “Six Thesis on Software Process Research”, Proceedings of the 6 th European Workshop on Software Process Technology, LNCS 1487, Springer Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
- 6.G.A. Cignoni, “Rapid Software Process Assessment to Promote Innovation in SMEs”, Proceedings of the European Software Day at Euromicro 99, 1999.Google Scholar
- 7.T. Stålhane, “SPI—why isn't it more used”, Proceedings of the EuroSPI'99 Conference, October 25–27, 1999.Google Scholar
- 8.J. Voas, “Software Quality's Eight Greatest Myths”, IEEE Software, Vol. 16, No. 5, September/October 1999.Google Scholar