Advertisement

Time-dependent techniques for the solution of viscous, heat conducting, chemically reacting, radiating discontinuous flows

  • Ephraim L. Rubin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 109)

Keywords

Shock Wave Mach Number Difference Scheme Vector Density Conservation Form 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

IV. References

  1. 1.
    Lax, P. D. and Wendroff, B.: System of Conservation Laws. Comm. Pure Applied Math., 13, pp. 217–237, 1960.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richtmyer, R. D.: A Survey of Difference Methods for Non-Steady Fluid Dynamics, NCAR Technical Note 63-2, 1962.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubin, E. L. and Burstein, S. Z.: Difference Methods for the Inviscid and Viscous Equations of a Compressible Gas. J. Comp. Phys., 2, pp. 178–196, 1967.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, J. L., Preiser, S. and Rubin, E. L.: Conservation Form of the Equations of Hydrodynamics in Curvilinear Coordinate Systems. J. Comp. Phys., 2, pp. 279–287, 1968.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubin, E. L. and Preiser, S.: Three-Dimensional Second Order Accurate Difference Schemes for Discontinuous Hydrodynamic Flows. Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, PIBAL Report No. 68-24, July 1968.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rubin, E. L. and Khosla, P. K.: On the Use of Time-Dependent Methods in the Solution of Inviscid Radiation Problems. Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, PIBAL Report No. 68-33, November 1968.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rubin, E. L. and Khosla, P. K.: The Shock Structure of a Viscous Heat Conducting Radiating Gas. Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, (in preparation).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palumbo, D. J. and Rubin, E. L.: The Inviscid Chemical Non-equilibrium Flow Behind a Moving Normal Shock Wave. Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, PIBAL Report No. 68-18, June 1968.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benison, G. and Rubin, E. L.: A Difference Method for the Solution of the Unsteady Quasi-One-Dimensional Viscous Flow in a Divergent Duct. Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, PIBAL Report No. 69-9, March 1969.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Truesdell, C. and Toupin, R.: The Classical Field Theories. Handbuch der Physik Bd. III/I ed. S. Flugge, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Truesdell, C.: The Physical Components of Vectors and Tensors. ZAMM, 33, pp. 345–356, 1953.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eisenhart, L. P.: Continuous Groups of Transformations. Dover Publications, New York, p. 208, 1961.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kreiss, H. O.: On Difference Approximations of the Dissipative Type for Hyperbolic Differential Equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 17, pp. 333–353, 1964.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heaslet, M. A. and Baldwin, B. S.: Predictions of the Structure of Radiation-Resisted Shock Waves. Phys. Fluids, 6, p. 781, 1963.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lax, P. D.: Weak Solutions of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations and Their Numerical Computation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 7, pp. 159–193, 1954.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morduchow, M. and Libby, P. A.: On the Distribution of Entropy Through a Shock Wave. J. de Mecanique, 4, 2, pp. 191–213, June 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ephraim L. Rubin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations