Advertisement

Motion measurements in low-contrast X-ray imagery

  • Martin Berger
  • Guido Gerig
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1496)

Abstract

Measuring motion in medical imagery becomes more and more important, in particular for object tracking, image registration, and local displacement measurements. Such measurements are especially difficult in megavoltage X-ray images (portal images), which are used to control the position of patients in high precision radiotherapy. Low contrast, blur, and noise render accurate measurements difficult.

In this work we review the framework of a generic matching algorithm only based on the image signal and not on binary image features. Thus, the often unreliable step of feature extraction in such imagery is circumvented. Another major advantage is the possibility of self-diagnosis, which is used for restricting the transformation in motion measurements if the image quality is not sufficient.

The method of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) allow for the computation of error free reference images, avoiding the additional step of therapy simulation. The multi-modal match between such DRRs and portal images lead to an estimate of the patient position during radiotherapy treatment. Results of generated data with known ground truth as well as results of a multi-modal match are presented.

Keywords

Portal Image Electronic Portal Imaging Device Template Region Cofactor Matrix Multiple Template 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. [Berger and Danuser 1997]
    Martin Berger and Gaudenz Danuser. Deformable multi template matching with application to portal images. In Proc. CVPR ’97, pages 374–379. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [Berger 1998]
    Martin Berger. The framework of least squares template matching. Technical Report 180, Image Science Lab, ETH Zürich, 1998. Available at http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/.Google Scholar
  3. [Danuser and Mazza 1996]
    G. Danuser and E. Mazza. Observing deformations of 20 nanometer with a low numerical aperture light microscope. In Optical Inspection and Micromeasurements, volume 2782, pages 180–191. SPIE, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. [Dong and Boyer 1996]
    L. Dong and A. L. Boyer. A portal image alignment and patient setup verification procedure using moments and correlation techniques. Phys. Med. Biol., 41(4):697–723, 1996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [Förstner 1987]
    W. Förstner. Reliability analysis of parameter estimation in linear models with applications to mensuration problems in computer vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 40:273–310, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Fritsch et al. 1995]
    D. S. Fritsch, E. L. Chaney, A. Boxwala, M. McAuliffe, S. Raghavan, A. Thall, and J. R. D. Earnhart. Core-based portal image registration for automatic radiotherapy treatment verification. Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys., 33(5):1287–1300, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [Gilhuijs and van Herk 1993]
    K. G. A. Gilhuijs and M. van Herk. Automatic on-line inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images. Med. Phys., 20(3):667–677, 1993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [Grün 1985]
    A. Grün. Adaptive least squares correlation: A powerful image matching technique. South African J. of Photogrammetry, 14(3):175–187, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. [Koch 1988]
    K. R. Koch. Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Springer, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. [Lucas and Kanade 1981]
    Bruce D. Lucas and Takeo Kanade. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In International joint conference on artificial intelligence, pages 674–679, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. [Moseley and Munro 1994]
    J. Moseley and P. Munro. A semiautomatic method for registration of portal images. Med. Phys., 21(4):551–558, 1994.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [Unser et al. 1995]
    M. Unser, P. Thévenaz, L. Chulhee, and U. Ruttimann. Registration and statistical analysis of pet images using the wavelet transform. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Sep./Oct. 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [van Herk and Meertens 1988]
    M. van Herk and H. Meertens. A matrix ionisation chamber imaging device for on-line patient setup verification during radiotherapy. Radiother. Oncol., 11(4):369–378, April 1988.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Berger
    • 1
  • Guido Gerig
    • 1
  1. 1.Communication Technology Lab Image ScienceSwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations