3D reconstruction from projection matrices in a C-arm based 3D-angiography system
3D reconstruction of arterial vessels from planar radiographs obtained at several angles around the object has gained increasing interest. The motivating application has been interventional angiography. In order to obtain a three-dimensional reconstruction from a C-arm mounted X-Ray Image Intensifier (XRII) traditionally the trajectory of the source and the detector system is characterized and the pixel size is estimated. The main use of the imaging geometry characterization is to provide a correct 3D-2D mapping between the 3D voxels to be reconstructed and the 2D pixels on the radiographic images.
We propose using projection matrices directly in a voxel driven backprojection for the reconstruction as opposed to that of computing all the geometrical parameters, including the imaging parameters. We discuss the simplicity of the entire calibration-reconstruction process, and the fact that it makes the computation of the pixel size, source to detector distance, and other explicit imaging parameters unnecessary.
A usual step in the reconstruction is sinogram weighting, in which the projections containing corresponding data from opposing directions have to be weighted before they are filtered and backprojected into the object space. The rotation angle of the C-arm is used in the sinogram weighting. This means that the C-arm motion parameters must be computed from projection matrices. The numerical instability associated with the decomposition of the projection matrices into intrinsic and extrinsic parameters is discussed in the context. The paper then describes our method of computing motion parameters without matrix decomposition. Examples of the calibration results and the associated volume reconstruction are also shown.
KeywordsProjection Matrix Detector Distance Projection Matrice Extrinsic Parameter Distortion Correction
- 2.R. Koppe E. Klotz J. Op de Beek and H. Aerts. 3D vessel reconstruction based on rotational angiography. In Computer Assitsted Radiology, pages 101–107. Springer, June 1995.Google Scholar
- 6.O.D. Faugeras. Three-Dimensional Computer Vision: A Geometric Viewpoint. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.Google Scholar
- 7.O.D. Faugeras and G. Toscani. The calibration problem for stereo. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recog., pages 15–20, Miami, FL, June 1986. IEEE.Google Scholar
- 9.S. Ganapathy. Decomposition of trnasformation matrices for robot vision. In Proc. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 130–139, 1984.Google Scholar
- 12.N. Navab. Direct estimation of rotation: A new quaternion formulation. Technical Report SCR-98-TR-631, Siemens Corporate Research, 755 College Road East, Princeton, NJ 08540, July 1998.Google Scholar
- 15.A. Rougée A. C. Picard Y. Trousset and C. Ponchut. Geometrical calibration for 3D X-ray imaging. In Image Capture, Formatting, and Display, volume 1897, pages 161–168. SPIE, February 1993.Google Scholar