Skip to main content

Video encryption based on data partitioning and scalable coding — A comparison

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Distributed Multimedia Systems and Telecommunication Services (IDMS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1483))

Abstract

Many of today's multimedia applications require confidential video transmission over the Internet. Appropriate encryption methods require a high computational complexity and are likely to become a performance bottleneck within software-only applications. To reduce the computational encryption effort, partial video encryption methods have been proposed in the past. Promising approaches are based on data partitioning where the encoded video stream is partitioned into two streams, one containing the most important data, the other one containing the least important data. Encrypting the most important data only can reduce the required computational complexity to 10 – 50 % compared to encryption of the whole data stream. Besides the known standardized DCT based video codecs, scalable codecs become more and more popular. Scalable codecs have the advantage that no additional effort is needed to obtain the required data partitioning. In this paper, a novel approach to partial video encryption based on data partitioning applicable to every DCT-based video codec is presented. It is compared to base layer encryption of a video stream encoded with a scalable codec based on a spatio-temporal resolution pyramid. Besides partial encryption, transparent encryption is discussed as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Schneier. Applied Cryptography. John Wiley, New York, 2nd edition, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.B. Maples and G.A. Spanos. Performance study of a selective encryption scheme for the security of networked real-time video. In Proc. 4th Int'l Conference on Computer and Communications, Las Vegas, NV, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Tang. Methods for encrypting and decrypting MPEG video data efficiently. In Proc. 4th ACM Int'l Multimedia Conference, Boston, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Kunkelmann and R. Reinema. A scalable security architecture for multimedia communication standards. In Proc. 4th IEEE Int'l Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Ottawa, Canada, Jun. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Kunkelmann, R. Reinema, R. Steinmetz, and T. Blecher. Evaluation of different video encryption methods for a secure multimedia conferencing gateway. In Proc. 4th COST 237 Workshop, Lisboa, Portugal, Dec. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B.M. Macq and J.J. Quisquater. Cryptology for digital TV broadcasting. Proc. of the IEEE, 83(6):944–957, Jun. 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. J. LeGall. MPEG: A video compression standard for multimedia applications. Comm. ACM, 34(4):46–58, Apr. 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. ITU-T. Recommendation H.261: Video codec for audiovisual services at px64 kbit/s, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ITU-T. Recommendation H.263: Video coding for low bit rate communication, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Girod. Scalable video for multimedia systems. Computers & Graphics, 17(3):269–276, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. U. Horn and B. Girod. Scalable video coding for the Internet. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 29(15):1833–1842, Nov. 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. J. LeGall. The MPEG video compression algorithm. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 4(2):129–140, Apr. 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Girod. Motion-compensating prediction with fractional-pel accuracy. IEEE Trans, on Communications, 41(4):604–612, Apr. 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Qiao and K. Nahrstedt. A new algorithm for MPEG video encryption. In Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. on Imaging Science, Systems and Technology, Las Vegas, NV, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Agi and L. Gong. An empirical study of secure MPEG video transmissions. In ISOC Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security, San Diego, CA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Meyer and F. Gadegast. Security mechanisms for multimedia data with the example MPEG-1 video. http://www.mpeg1.de/doc/secmeng.ps.gz, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO/ IEC. International Standard 13818-2: Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Video, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Chadda, G. Wall, and B. Schmidt. An end-to-end software-only scalable video delivery system. In Proc. NOSSDAV'95, Apr. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Hoffman and M. Speer. Hierarchical video distribution over Internet-style networks. In Proc. ICIP'96, volume I, pages 5–8, Lausanne, Sep. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Tan, E. Chang, and A. Zakhor. Real time software implementation of scalable video codec. In Proc. ICIP'96, volume I, pages 17–20, Lausanne, Sep. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.K. Uz, M. Vetterli, and D.J. LeGall. Interpolative multiresolution coding of advanced television with compatible subchannels. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 1(1):86–99, Mar. 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Vetterli and K.M. Uz. Multiresolution coding techniques for digital television: A review. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 3:161–187, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Girod, U. Horn, and B. Belzer. Scalable video coding with multiscale motion compensation and unequal error protection. In Y. Wang, S. Panwar, S.-P. Kim, and H. L. Bertoni, editors, Multimedia Communications and Video Coding, pages 475–482. Plenum Press, New York, Oct. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. U. Horn and B. Girod. Performance analysis of multiscale motion compensation techniques in pyramid coders. In Proc. ICIP'96, volume III, pages 255–258, Lausanne, Sep. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M.J.B. Robshaw. Stream ciphers. Technical Report TR-701, RSA Laboratories, Jun. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Mathew and J.F. Arnold. Layered coding using bitstream decomposition with drift correction. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 7(6):882–891, Dec. 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Plagemann Vera Goebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kunkelmann, T., Horn, U. (1998). Video encryption based on data partitioning and scalable coding — A comparison. In: Plagemann, T., Goebel, V. (eds) Interactive Distributed Multimedia Systems and Telecommunication Services. IDMS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1483. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0055308

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0055308

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64955-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49914-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics