Skip to main content

What can agents do in industry, and why? An overview of industrially-oriented R&D at CEC

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cooperative Information Agents II Learning, Mobility and Electronic Commerce for Information Discovery on the Internet (CIA 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1435))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Center for Electronic Commerce (CEC) embodies over fourteen years of experience in applying agents to industrial problems. We have found such a fit in three areas: coordination of industrial designers, simulation and modeling of complex products and processes, and scheduling and control of production systems. This presentation outlines several trends in modern manufacturing, describes how these trends affect the three problem areas, discusses the features of agents that make them attractive candidates for implementing such systems, and reviews example applications from CEC's portfolio in each of these areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AIAG. Manufacturing Assembly Pilot (MAP) Project Final Report. M-4, Automotive Industry Action Group, Southfield, MI, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. Albus, H. G. McCain, and R. Lumia. NASA/NBS Standard Reference Model for Telerobot Control System Architecture (NASREM). NBS Technical Note 1235, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. H. Clearwater, Editor. Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation. Singapore, World Scientific, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. Corera, I. Laresgoiti, and N. R. Jennings. Using ARCHON, Part 2: Electricity Transportation Management. IEEE Expert, 11(6):71–79, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Finnie, Editor. Unit Manufacturing Processes: Issues and Opportunities in Research. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. W. Forrester. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Hoy. The Manufacturing Assembly Pilot (MAP): A Breakthrough in Information System Design. EDI Forum, 10(1):26–28, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Jennings. Applying Agent Technology. Plenary presentation at PAAM'96. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. R. Jennings, E. H. Mamdani, J. M. Corera, I. Laresgoiti, F. Perriolat, P. Skarek, and L. Z. Varga. Using ARCHON to develop real-word DAI applications, Part 1. IEEE Expert, 11(6):64–70, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. P. Judd, J. F. White, P. K. Hickman, M. E. Brown, and J. A. Sauter. System for combining originally software incompatible control, kinematic, and discrete event simulation systems into a single integrated simulation system., Industrial Technology Institute, U.S., 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Langton, R. Burkhart, and G. Ropella. The Swarm Simulation System. http://www.santafe.edu/projects/swarm/, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, Editors. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. N. Nagel and R. Dove. 21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy. Bethlehem, PA, Agility Forum, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. V. D. Parunak. Manufacturing Experience with the Contract Net. In M. N. Huhns, Editor, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 285–310. Pitman, London, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. V. D. Parunak. Workshop Report: Implementing Manufacturing Agents. http://www.iti.org/∼van/paamncms.ps, Industrial Technology Institute, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. V. D. Parunak. DASCh: Dynamic Analysis of Supply Chains. http://www.iti.org/∼van/dasch, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. V. D. Parunak. Agent-Based Behavioral Emulation vs. Numerical Simulation: A Users' Guide. In Proceedings of ICMAS '98 Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. V. D. Parunak, A. D. Baker, and S. J. Clark. The AARIA Agent Architecture: An Example of Requirements-Driven Agent-Based System Design. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (ICAA-97), 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. V. D. Parunak and R. Judd. Sharpening the focus on intelligent control. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 3(1):1–5, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. V. D. Parunak, J. Kindrick, and B. Irish. Material Handling: A Conservative Domain for Neural Connectivity and Propagation. In Proceedings of Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 307–311, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. V. D. Parunak, J. Kindrick, and B. W. Irish. A Connectionist Model for Material Handling. Robotics & Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 4(3/4):643–654, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. V. D. Parunak, A. Ward, M. Fleischer, and J. Sauter. A Marketplace of Design Agents for Distributed Concurrent Set-Based Design. In Proceedings of ISPE/CE97: Fourth ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. V. D. Parunak, A. Ward, M. Fleischer, J. Sauter, and T.-C. Chang. Distributed Component-Centered Design as Agent-Based Distributed Constraint Optimization. In Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Constraints and Agents, pages 93–99, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. V. D. Parunak, A. Ward, and J. Sauter. A Systematic Market Approach To Distributed Constraint Problems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages (submitted), AAAI, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Perriolat, P. Skarek, L. Z. Varga, and N. R. Jennings. Using ARCHON, Part 3: Particle Accelerator Control. IEEE Expert, 11(6):80–86, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J.-F. Perrot. Preface. In J. Ferber, Editor, Les Systèmes Multi-Agents: Vers une intelligence collective, pages xiii–xiv. InterEditions, Paris, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, Editors. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. A. Sauter and R. P. Judd. XSpec: The Modeling and Design of Complex Systems. In Proceedings of DARPA Manufacturing, Engineering, Design, Automation Workshop, pages 125–132, DARPA SISTO and DSO, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Ward, J. K. Liker, J. J. Cristiano, and D. K. S. Cristiano II. The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster. Sloan Management Review, (Spring):43–61, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Matthias Klusch Gerhard Weiß

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Dyke Parunak, H. (1998). What can agents do in industry, and why? An overview of industrially-oriented R&D at CEC. In: Klusch, M., Weiß, G. (eds) Cooperative Information Agents II Learning, Mobility and Electronic Commerce for Information Discovery on the Internet. CIA 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1435. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053670

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053670

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64676-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69109-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics