Skip to main content

Meta-Reasoning for Data Analysis Tool Allocation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis Reasoning about Data (IDA 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1280))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 711 Accesses

Abstract

It is desirable that data analysis tools become more autonomous in managing their computational resources, minimizing risk and cost, assessing their errors, developing new representations, and integrating with other data analysis tools. To aid in this development we introduce a design for using Meta-Reasoning in a Data Analysis Tool Allocation system that employs analogical and structural reasoning to learn from and across domains and its experience. We give a formal definition of a “Data Analysis Game” that allows the implementation of a hierarchical learning framework suitable for describing and exploring real-world analysis problems. The framework may also be used to analyze the performance of the Tool Allocation system itself, allowing it to self-optimize. If the integration of tools is performed correctly, it should allow a cost-efficient level of performance not obtainable with a single tool alone or with unsystematic use of a group of tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Allen, E. Hamilton, and R. Levinson, “New advances in adaptive pattern-oriented chess,” in Proceedings of 8th Annual Conference on Advances in Computer Chess, (Maastricht, Neatherlands), June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Brieman, Classification and regression trees. The Wadsworth statistics/probability series, Wadsworth International Group, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Cost and S. Salzberg, “A weighted nearest neighbor algorithm for learning with symbolic features,” Machine Learning, vol. 10, pp. 57–67, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Forgy, “Rete: A fast algorithm for the many pattern/many object patern match problem,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17–37, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Gould and R. Levinson, “Experience-based adaptive search,” in Machine Learning:A Multi-Strategy Approach (R. Michalski and G. Tecuci, eds.), vol. 4, pp. 579–604, Morgan Kauffman, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Langley, Elements of Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Levinson, “General game-playing and reinforcement learning,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 12, pp. 155–176, February 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Levinson and R. Snyder, “Adaptive pattern oriented chess,” in Proceedings of AAAI-91, pp. 601–605, Morgan-Kaufman, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. A. Levinson, “Uds: A universal data structure,” in Proc. 2ND International Conference on Conceptual Structures, (College Park, Maryland USA), pp. 230–250, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Markovitch and Y. Sella, “Learning of resource allocation strategies for game playing,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 12, pp. 88–105, February 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. P. Miranker, “Treat: A better match algorithm for ai production systems,” in Proceedings of AAAI-87, pp. 42–47, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Morales, “Learning patterns for playing strategies,” International Computer Chess Association Journal, vol. 17, pp. 15–26, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Omohundro, “Efficient algorithms with neural network behavior,” Tech. Rep. UIUCDCS-R-87-1331, University of Illinois, April 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. D. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. 1–2. MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Russell and E. Wefald, Do The Right Thing: studies in limited rationality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Sutton, “Special issue on reinforcement learning,” Machine Learning, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. S. Sutton, “Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences,” Machine Learning, vol. 3, pp. 9–44, August 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Xiaohui Liu Paul Cohen Michael Berthold

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Levinson, R., Wilkinson, J. (1997). Meta-Reasoning for Data Analysis Tool Allocation. In: Liu, X., Cohen, P., Berthold, M. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis Reasoning about Data. IDA 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1280. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052832

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052832

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63346-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69520-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics