Skip to main content

The composition heuristic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foundations of Computer Science

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1337))

  • 268 Accesses

Abstract

An essential heuristic in the SHUNYATA program is the composition heuristic which produces predicates and formulas forming the central “ideas” of proofs. In the proof of a rather simple theorem in mathematical logic, it generates a predicate. In the proof of Gödel's incompleteness theorem, it generates an undecidable formula. The construction of the above predicate and the undecidable formula ordinarily requires the application of Cantor's famous diagonal method. The composition heuristic was originally developed as a learning procedure which generates theorem provers automatically.

This work, in whole or in part, describes components of machines, processes, and programs protected by patents, patent applications, and copyright laws. Further information is available from the author. Copyright © 1997 by Kurt Ammon. All rights reserved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammon, K., The Automatic Development of Concepts and Methods. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Hamburg, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ammon, K., The automatic acquisition of proof methods, Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ammon, K., Automatic proofs in mathematical logic and analysis. 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Saratoga Springs, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ammon, K., The SHUNYATA system. 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Saratoga Springs, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ammon, K., An automatic proof of Gödel's incompleteness theorem. Artificial Intelligence 61, 1993, pp. 291–306.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bibel, W., Automated Theorem Proving. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brüning, S., Thielscher, M., and Bibel, W., Letter to the Editor, Artificial Intelligence 64, 1993, pp. 353–354.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gödel, K., über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, Vol. 38, pp. 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kleene, S. C., Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Letz, R., Schuhmann, J., Bayerl, S., and Bibel, W., SETHEO: A high-performance prover. Journal of Automated Reasoning 8, 1992, pp. 182–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loveland, D. W., Automated Theorem Proving: A Logical Basis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mendelson, E., Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christian Freksa Matthias Jantzen Rüdiger Valk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ammon, K. (1997). The composition heuristic. In: Freksa, C., Jantzen, M., Valk, R. (eds) Foundations of Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1337. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052112

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052112

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63746-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69640-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics