Skip to main content

Robustness of adaptive control of robots: Theory and experiment

  • Adaptation And Learning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advanced Robot Control

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 162))

Abstract

It is well known in adaptive control theory that the performance of adaptive controllers can be highly sensitive to the modeling assumptions used to prove convergence. In this paper we discuss the robustness of adaptive control of rigid robots and methods for improving robustness in the face of unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances. Both theoretical and experimental results are presented. Robustness is achieved by modifying the rigid control algorithm in two important ways. First, the rigid robot control law is incorporated into a composite slow/fast control law by adding to it a “fast” control to damp the joint oscillations. Second, so-called σ-modification is used to ensure boundedness of the estimated parameters.

Research partially supported by the University of Illinois Manufacturing Research Center under Grant No. UFAS 1-5-80405.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, M., and Spong, M.W., “Compensator Design for Robot Manipulators with Flexible Joints,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Systems Engineering, Dayton, OH, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Craig, J.J., Hsu, P., and Sastry, S., “Adaptive Control of Mechanical Manipulators,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Desoer, C., and Vidyasagar, M., Feedback Systems: Input-Output Properties, Academic Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ghorbel, F., “Adaptive Control of Flexible Joint Robot Manipulators: A Singular Perturbation Approach,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghorbel, F., Hung, J.Y., and Spong, M.W., “Adaptive Control of Flexible Joint Manipulators,” Proc. 1989 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 1188–1193, Phoenix, AZ, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghorbel, F., Hung, J.Y., and Spong, M.W., “Adaptive Control of Flexible Joint Manipulators,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. 9–13, December, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghorbel, F., and Spong, M.W., “Stability Analysis of Adaptively Controlled Flexible Joint Manipulators,” Coordinated Science Laboratory Report, UILU-ENG-90-2246, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, September, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hung, J.Y., “Robust Control of Flexible Joint Robot Manipulators,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hung, J.Y., Bortoff, S., Ghorbel, F., and Spong, M.W., “A Comparison of Feedback Linearization and Singular Perturbation Techniques for the Control of Flexible Joint Robots,” Proc. 1989 ACC, pp. 25–30, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ioannou, P.A., and Kokotović, P.V., “Instability Analysis and Improvement of Robustness of Adaptive Control,” Automatica, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 583–594, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ioannou, P.A., and Tsakalis, K., “A Robust Direct Adaptive Controller,” IEEE Trans. Automatic Control,, AC-31, pp. 1033–1043, November, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kokotović, P.V., Khalil, H.,K., and O'Reilly, J., Singular Perturbation Methods in Control: Analysis and Design, Academic Press, Inc., London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Middleton, R.H., and Goodwin, G.C., “Adaptive Computed Torque Control for Rigid Link Manipulators,” Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 10, 9–16, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ortega, R., and Spong, M.W., “Adaptive Control of Rigid Robots: A Tutorial,” Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 1575–1584, Austin, TX, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riedle, B.D., and Kokotović, P.K., “Integral Manifolds of Slow Adaptation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-31, no. 4, pp. 316–324, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rohrs, C.E., Valavani, L., Athans, M., and Stein, G., “Robustness of Adaptive Control Algorithms in the Presence of Unmodeled Dynamics,” Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 3–11, Orlando, FL, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saberi, A., and Khalil, H.,K., Quadratic-Type Lyapunov Functions for Singularly Perturbed Systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Con., Vol AC-29, No. 6, June 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slotine, J.-J. E., and Li, W., “On the Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators”, Int. J. of Robotics Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 49–59, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spong, M.W., “Modeling and Control of Elastic Joint Manipulators”, J. Dyn. Sys., Meas. and Control, Vol. 109, 310–319, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spong, M.W., “Adaptive Control of Flexible Joint Manipulators”, Systems and Controls Letters, Vol. 13, pp. 15–21, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spong, M.W., “The Control of Flexible Joint Robots: A Survey,” in New Trends and Applications of Distributed Parameter Control Systems, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, G. Chen, E.B. Lee, W. Littman, and L. Markus, Eds., Chapter 12, pp. 355–383, Marcel Dekker Publishers, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spong, M. W., Ortega, R., and Kelly, R., “Comments on ‘Adaptive Manipulator Control',” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-35, no. 6, pp. 761–762, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spong, M.W., and Vidyasagar, M., Robot Dynamics and Control, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor, D.G., Kokotović, P.V., Marino, R., and Kanellakopoulos, I., “Adaptive Regulation of Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-34, no. 4, pp. 405–412, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sadegh, N., and Horowitz, R., “An Exponentially Stable Adaptive Control Law for Robotic Manipulators,” Proc. American Control Conf., San Diego, May, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartz, H.M., and Warshaw, G., “On the Richness Condition for Robot Adaptive Control,” ASME Winter Annual Meeting, DSC-Vol. 14, pp 43–49, Dec. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bayard, D.S., and Wen, J.T., “A New Class of Control Laws for Robotic Manipulators-Part 2. Adaptive Case,” Int. J. of Control, 47(5):1387–1406, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Middleton, R.H., and Kokotovic, P.V., “Boundedness Properties of Simple Indirect Adaptive Control Systems,” submitted to 1991 ACC and IEEE Trans. on Automatic Cont., September, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Streit, D.A., Krousgrill, C.M., and Bajaj, A.K., “Nonlinear Response of Flexible Robotic Manipulators Performing Repetitive Tasks,” ASME J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., and Cont., Vol. 111, pp. 470–480, Sept., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Carlos Canudas de Wit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ghorbel, F., Fitzmorris, A., Spong, M.W. (1991). Robustness of adaptive control of robots: Theory and experiment. In: Canudas de Wit, C. (eds) Advanced Robot Control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 162. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0039263

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0039263

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54169-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47479-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics