Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An informal review of model validation

  • Part I Essays
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover The Modeling of Uncertainty in Control Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 192))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Goodwin and M. Salgado, “Quantification of uncertainty in estimation using an embedding principle,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Goodwin, B. Ninness, and M. Salgado, “Quantification of uncertainty in estimation,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 2400–2405, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. M. Ninness and G. C. Goodwin, “Robust frequency response estimation accounting for noise and undermodeling,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 2847–2851, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Hjalmarsson and L. Ljung, “Estimating model variance in the case of undermodeling,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. 37, pp. 1004–1008, July 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Ljung, System Identification, Theory for the User. Information and System Sciences Series, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Helmicki, C. Jacobson, and C. Nett, “H ∞ identification of stable lsi systems: A scheme with direct application to controller design,” Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 1428–1434, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. Helmicki, C. A. Jacobson, and C. N. Nett, “Control oriented system identification: A worst-case/deterministic approach in H ∞,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, pp. 1163–1176, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Mäkilä and J. Partingtion, “Robust approximation and identification in H ∞,” Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 70–76, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Mäkilä, “Laguerre methods and H ∞ identification of continuous-time systems,” Int. J. of Control, vol. 53, pp. 689–707, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Gu and P. P. Khargonekar, “Linear and nonlinear algorithms for identification in H ∞ with error bounds,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 64–69, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. S. Smith and J. Doyle, “Model invalidation — a connection between robust control and identification,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 1435–1440, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. S. Smith, Model Validation for Uncertain Systems. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. M. Krause, “Stability margins with real parameter uncertainty: Test data implications,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 1441–1445, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Doyle, “Structured uncertainty in control system design,” in Proc. IEEE Control Decision Conf., pp. 260–265, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. K. Packard, What's new with μ. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, μ-Analysis and Synthesis Toolbox (μ-Tools), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. A. Dahleh and J. B. Pearson, Jr., “l 1-optimal feedback controllers for MIMO discrete-time systems,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. AC-32, pp. 314–322, Apr. 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Khammash and J. B. Pearson, Jr., “Performance robustness of discrete-time systems with structured uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. AC-36, pp. 398–412, Apr. 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. K. H. Fan and A. L. Tits, “Characterization and efficient computation of the structured singular value,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. AC-31, pp. 734–743, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. K. H. Fan and A. L. Tits, “m-form numerical range and the computation of the structured singular value,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. AC-33, pp. 284–289, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. S. Smith and J. C. Doyle, “Model validation: A connection between robust control and identification,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. 37, pp. 942–952, July 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. S. Smith, “Model validation for robust control: an experimental process control application.” to be presented: IFAC World Congress, July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. S. Smith, “Model validation and parameter identification for systems in H ∞ and l 1,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 2852–2856, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Poolla, P. Khargonekar, A. Tikku, J. Krause, and K. Nagpal, “A time-domain approach to model validation,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 313–317, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Zhou and H. Kimura, “Input-output extrapolation-minimization theorem and its application to model validation and robust identification,” in The Modeling of Uncertainty in Control: Proceedings of the 1992 Santa Barbara Workshop (R. Smith and M. Dahleh, eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1993. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. S. Smith and J. C. Doyle, “Towards a methodology for robust parameter identification,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 2394–2399, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. M. Krause, P. P. Khargonekar, and G. Stein, “Robust parameter adjustment with nonparametric weighted-ball-in-H ∞ uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. AC-35, pp. 225–229, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. M. Krause and P. P. Khargonekar, “Parameter identification in the presence of non-parametric dynamic uncertainty,” Automatica, vol. 26, pp. 113–124, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Kosut, M. Lau, and S. Boyd, “Parameter set identification of systems with uncertain nonparametric dynamics and disturbances,” in Proc. IEEE Control Decision Conf., vol. 6, pp. 3162–3167, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. J. P. Schrama, “Accurate identification for control: the necessity of an iterative scheme,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. 37, pp. 991–994, July 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. J. Schrama and P. M. V. den Hof, “An iterative scheme for identification and control design based on coprime factorizations,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 2842–2846, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Z. Zang, R. R. Bitmead, and M. Gevers, “H 2 iterative model refinement and control robustness enhancement,” in Proc. IEEE Control Decision Conf., pp. 279–284, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Z. Zang, R. R. Bitmead, and M. Gevers, “Disturbance rejection: on-line refinement of controllers by closed loop modelling,” in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., pp. 2929–2833, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical & Computer Engineering Dept., University of California, 93106, Santa Barbara, CA

    Roy Smith

Authors
  1. Roy Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Roy S. Smith PhD Mohammed Dahleh PhD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smith, R. (1994). An informal review of model validation. In: Smith, R.S., Dahleh, M. (eds) The Modeling of Uncertainty in Control Systems. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 192. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0036248

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0036248

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19870-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39327-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation