Advertisement

Lessons learned from a successful collaboration between software engineers and human interface engineers

  • Ellen A. Isaacs
  • Trevor Morris
  • Thomas K. Rodriguez
Submitted Papers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 896)

Abstract

Most software applications are difficult to use because the development process emphasizes the quality of the architecture and not the usability of the application. Programs can be both well engineered and usable if software engineers work with human interface engineers who not only design the user interface but advocate architectural decisions that help make tasks more natural for users. Our group used a process that reduced the workload of the software engineers and yet produced a particularly usable and well-engineered application. This process included designing the UI before coding, developing the application's user interface in a UI builder, and regularly testing the application with users under realistic conditions. This latter point was an important achievement because it is critical and yet particularly difficult to test collaborative applications. Carrying out these activities enabled the software engineers and human interface engineers to work closely together as a cooperative team because everyone was able to contribute valued components to the effort.

Keywords

User Interface Software Engineer Graphic Designer Audience Member Human Interface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Gru88]
    Grudin, J., Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, OR, September 1988, pp. 85–93.Google Scholar
  2. [BW91]
    I Can't Work This Thing! Business Week, April 29, 1991, pp. 58–66.Google Scholar
  3. [JMWU91]
    Jeffries, R., J. R. Miller, C. Wharton & K. M. Uyeda, User Interface Evaluation in the Real World: A Comparison of Four Techniques, Proceedings of CHI '91 Conference, New Orleans, LA, April-May, 1991, pp. 119–124.Google Scholar
  4. [Pet94]
    Peters, Tom, To Make Your Product Stand Out, Pay Close Attention to Design, San Jose Mercury News, May 16, 1994, p. 3D.Google Scholar
  5. [NP93]
    Nielsen, J. and V. L. Phillips, Estimating the Relative Usability of Two Interfaces: Heuristic, Formal and Empirical Methods Compared, Proceedings of INTERCHl '93 Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April, 1993, pp. 214–221.Google Scholar
  6. [Shn92]
    Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen A. Isaacs
    • 1
  • Trevor Morris
    • 1
  • Thomas K. Rodriguez
    • 1
  1. 1.SunSoft, Inc.Mountain View

Personalised recommendations