Skip to main content

Partial semantics for disjunctive deductive databases

Extended abstract

  • Theoretical Aspects 1
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1134))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 144 Accesses

Abstract

We consider in this paper interesting subclasses of partial stable models which reduce the degree of undefinedness, namely M-stable (Maximal-stable) models, which coincide with regular models, preferred extension, and maximal stable classes, and L-stable (Least undefinedstable) models, and we extend them from normal to disjunctive deductive databases.

L-stable models are shown to be the natural relaxation of the notion of total stable model; on the other hand the less strict M-stable models, endowed with a modularity property, may be appealing from the programming and computational point of view. M-stable and L-stable models are also compared with regular models on disjunctive deductive databases. It appears that, unlike on normal deductive databases, M-stable models do not coincide with regular models. Moreover, both M-stable and L-stable models satisfy the CWA principle, while regular models do not.

This author has been partially supported by Istituto per la Sistemistica e l'Informatica — Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, ISI-CNR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Apt and H. Blair. Arithmetic Classification of Perfect Models of Stratified Programs. In Proc. of the Fifth Joint Int'l Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming (JICSLP-88), pp. 766–779. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Baral and V. Subrahmanian. Stable and Extension Class Theory for Logic Programs and Default Logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 8:345–366, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Dix. Classifying Semantics of Disjunctive Logic Programs. In K. Apt, editor, Proc. JICSLP-92, pp. 798–812. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Dung. Negation as Hypotheses: An Abductive Foundation for Logic Programming. In Proc. ICLP-91, pp. 3–17. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Eiter, G. Gottlob, and H. Mannila. Adding Disjunction to Datalog. In Proc. PODS '94, pp. 267–278, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Eiter, N. Leone, and D. Saccà. On the Partial Semantics for Disjunctive Deductive Databases. Technical Report CD-TR 95/82, Christian Doppler Lab for Expert Systems, TU Vienna, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fitting. A Kripke-Kleene Semantics for Logic Programs. Journal of Logic Programming, 2(4):295–312, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In Proc. Fifth Intl Conference and Symposium, pp. 1070–1080. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Kakas and P. Mancarella. Preferred Extensions are Partial Stable Models. Journal of Logic Programming, 14:341–348, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V. Lifschitz and H. Turner. Splitting a Logic Program. In Proc. ICLP-94, pp. 23–38, MIT-Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Minker. On Indefinite Data Bases and the Closed World Assumption. In Proc. CADE '82, pp. 292–308, LNCS 138. Springer, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Przymusinski. Stable Semantics for Disjunctive Programs. New Generation Computing, 9:401–424, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Reiter. On Closed-World Databases. In H. Gallaire and J. Minker, editors, Logic and Data Bases, pp. 55–76. Plenum Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Ross. Modular Stratification and Magic Sets for Datalog Programs with Negation. Journal of the ACM, 41(6):1216–1267, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Saccá. The Expressive Powers of Stable Models for Bound and Unbound DAT-ALOG Queries. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1996. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Schlipf. The Expressive Powers of Logic Programming Semantics. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 51(1):64–86, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. D. Ullman. Principles of Database and Knowledge Base Systems. Computer Science Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. van Gelder, K. Ross, and J. Schlipf. The Well-Founded Semantics for General Logic Programs. Journal of the ACM, 38(3):620–650, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.-H. You and L. Yuan. A Three-Valued Semantics for Deductive Databases and Logic Programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 49:334–361, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.-H. You and L. Yuan. On the Equivalence of Semantics for Normal Logic Programming. Journal of Logic Programming, 22(3):211–222, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Roland R. Wagner Helmut Thoma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eiter, T., Leone, N., Saccà, D. (1996). Partial semantics for disjunctive deductive databases. In: Wagner, R.R., Thoma, H. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1134. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034711

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0034711

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61656-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70651-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics