Advertisement

The determination of Lamb shift from the anisotropy quenching radiation from metastable hydrogenic atoms

  • P. S. Farago
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 143)

Abstract

The measurement of the anisotropy in the quenching radiation emitted by metastable hydrogenic systems in an electric field can be used to determine the Lamb shift. This approach was conceived as a method for the measurement of Lamb shift in high-Z ions but was tested on H, D and He+ where high precision Lamb shift values are available both from theory and from earlier experiments.

After a brief outline of the principle of the method, the main experimental problems are surveyed and the results are summarized.

Keywords

Lamb Shift Static Electric Field Anisotropy Measurement Asymmetry Measurement Hyperfine State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Casalese J.S. and Gerjuoy E. 1969 Phys. Rev. 180, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cosens B.J. 1968 Phys. Rev. 173, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Drake G.W.F. and Grimley R.B. 1973 Phys. Rev. A8, 157.Google Scholar
  4. Drake G.W.F. and Grimley R.B. 1975 Phys. Rev. All, 1614.Google Scholar
  5. Drake G.W.F., Farago P.S. and van Wijngaarden A. 1975, Phys. Rev. All, 1621.Google Scholar
  6. Drake G.W.F. and Lin C.P. 1976, A14, 1296.Google Scholar
  7. Drake G.W.F., Goldman S.P. and van Wijngaarden A. 1979, Phys. Rev. A20, 1299.Google Scholar
  8. Erickson G.W. 1971, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 780 (see also: J. Chem. Phys. Ref. Data 6, 831, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fite W.L., Kauppila W.E. and Ott W.R. 1968, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipworth E. and Novick R. 1957, Phys. Rev. 108, 1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mohr P.J. 1976, in Beam Foil Spectroscopy, ed. I.A. Sellin and D.J. Pegg (Plenum, New York, 1976) p. 89.Google Scholar
  12. Narasimham M. and Strombotne R. 1971, Phys. Rev. A4, 14.Google Scholar
  13. Ott W.R., Kauppila W.E. and Fite W.L. 1970, Phys, Rev. Al, 1089.Google Scholar
  14. Robiscoe R. and Shyn T. 1970, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24. 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Triebwasser S., Dayhoff E.S. and Lamb Jr. W.E. 1953, Phys. Rev. 89, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Wijngaarden A., Goh E., Drake G.W.F. and Farago P.S. 1976, J.Phys. B. (Atom. Molec. Phys.) 9, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Wijngaarden A. and Drake G.W.F., 1978 Phys. Rev. A17, 1366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. S. Farago
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations