Advertisement

Algorithm and care pathway: Clinical guidelines and healthcare processes

  • Colin Gordon
  • Peter Johnson
  • Chris Waite
  • Mario Veloso
Protocols and Guidelines
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1211)

Abstract

This paper reports ongoing work in the project PRESTIGE: Guidelines in Healthcare. An approach has been developed to representing the knowledge content of clinical guideline and protocols, using a declarative model incorporating a lifecycle model of clinical acts and activities. We also encountered the need to analyse and model the healthcare processes in which the use of a clinical guideline is embedded. A business process re-engineering (BPRE) methodology, developed in the previous AIM programme project SHINE, has been used for this purpose, enabling the mapping of the knowledge components of a clinical guideline to the specific healthcare processes where they are applicable. We review the need for a combination of algorithmic and process-oriented views of guideline knowledge in order to enable effective delivery of guideline-based clinical decision support.

Keywords

Clinical Guideline Medical Informatics Guideline Implementation Knowledge Component Healthcare Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P. Barahona and J. Christensen (eds.), Knowledge and Decision in Health Telematics, IOS Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Gordon and J.P. Christensen (Eds.), Health Telematics for Clinical Guidelines and Protocols. IOS Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    C Gordon, SI Herbert, P Johnson, Knowledge Representation and Clinical Practice Guidelines: the DILEMMA and PRESTIGE projects. Medical Informatics Europe '96, IOS Press 1996, 511–515.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Institute of Medicine (M. J. Field and K. N. Lohr Eds.) Guidelines for Clinical Practice. From Development to Use. National Academy Press, Washington DC 1992.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F Cluzeau, P Littlejohns, JM Grimshaw, A Hopkins, Appraising clinical guidelines and the development of criteria — a pilot study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 9:3, 227–235, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. M. Grimshaw, I. T. Russell, “Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations” (Lancet 1993, Vol 342342 27 Nov 1993 p 1317–1322).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Effective Health Care Bulletin. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: can guidelines be used to improve clinical practice? Leeds: University of Leeds, 1994Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Haug PJ, Gardner RM, Tate KE et al. Decision support in medicine: examples from the HELP system. Computers and Biomedical Research 1994: 27: 396–418.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Johnson PE, What kind of system should an expert be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7, 77–97 1983Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C Gordon, May we support your decision? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 1:3, 175–7 July 1996.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C Gordon and M Veloso, The PRESTIGE Project: Implementing Guidelines in Healthcare. Medical Informatics Europe '96, IOS Press 1996, 887–891.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    D Pitty, P Reeves, C Gordon, Z Ilic, A Rickards, Telematics Support for the Shared Care Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Prestige Project. Medical Informatics Europe '96, IOS Press 1996, 925–929.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    David C Kibbe et al, Integrating Guidelines with Continuous Quality Improvement, Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 20:4; p181ff, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Society for Medical Decision Making Committee on Standardization of Clinical Algorithms, Proposal for Clinical Algorithm Standards. Medical Decision Making 12, 149–154, 1992.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    MA Musen, Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Computers and Biomedical Research 25: 435–467.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Gordon
    • 1
  • Peter Johnson
    • 2
  • Chris Waite
    • 3
  • Mario Veloso
    • 4
  1. 1.Royal Brompton HospitalUK
  2. 2.Sowerby Unit for Primary Care InformaticsUniversity of NewcastleAustralia
  3. 3.Siemens Nixdorf Health SolutionsGermany
  4. 4.CENTISLisbon

Personalised recommendations