Acceptability of arguments as ‘logical uncertainty’
We briefly discuss the argumentation-paradigm as a unifying framework for practical reasoning and then turn to the definition of a system of argumentation that induces a novel concept of logical uncertainty over conclusions drawn from inconsistent databases.
KeywordsPractical Reasoning Belief Revision Belief State Closure Property Possibility Theory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.S. Benferhat, D. Dubois and H. Prade. Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. UAI'93. Pp. 411–419.Google Scholar
- 2.D. Dubois and H. Prade. Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerised Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press, New York. 1988.Google Scholar
- 3.D. Dubois and H. Prade. An Introduction to Possibilistic and Fuzzy Logics. In: Non-Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning. Academic Press, London. 1988.Google Scholar
- 4.P.M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and human's social and economic affairs. Accepted for IJCAI'93.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Elvang-Gøransson, J. Fox and P. Krause. Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information. UAI'93. Pp. 114–121.Google Scholar
- 6.P. Gärdenfors. Knowledge in flux. MIT Press. 1988.Google Scholar
- 7.F. Lin and Y. Shoham. Argument systems: a uniform basis for nonmonotonic reasoning. KR'89. Pp. 245–255.Google Scholar
- 8.G. Pinkas and R.P. Loui. Reasoning from inconsistency: a taxonomy of principles for resolving conflict. KR'92. Pp. 709–719.Google Scholar
- 9.G. Wagner. Ex contradictione nihil sequitur. IJCAI'91. Pp. 538–543.Google Scholar