Skip to main content

Learning structurally indeterminate clauses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1446))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes a new kind of language bias, S-structural indeterminate clauses, which takes into account the meaning of predicates that play a key role in the complexity of learning in structural domains. Structurally indeterminate clauses capture an important background knowledge in structural domains such as medicine, chemistry or computational linguistics: the specificity of the component/object relation. The REPART algorithm has been specifically developed to learn such clauses. Its efficiency lies in a particular change of representation so as to be able to use propositional learners. Because of the indeterminacy of the searched clauses the propositional learning problem to be solved is a kind of Multiple-Instance problem. Such reformulations may be a general approach for learning non determinate clauses in ILP. This paper presents original results discovered by REPART that exemplify how ILP algorithms may not only scale up efficiently to large relational databases but also discover useful and computationally hard-to-learn patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Suen, C., Computational Analysis of Mandarin. Interdisciplinary System Research. 1972: Birkhduser.

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Raedt, L. and L. Dehaspe, Clausal discovery. Machine Learning Journal, 1996. 26(3): p. 99–145.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zucker, J.-D., J.-G. Ganascia, and I. Bournaud, Relational Knowledge Discovery in a Chinese Characters Database. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 1998. 12(5) to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kietz, J.-U. and S. Wrobel, Controlling the Complexity of Learning in Logic through Syntactic and Task-Oriented Models, in Inductive Logic Programming, S. Muggleton, Editor. 1992, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: London. p. 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muggleton, S. and L. De Raedt, Inductive Logic Programming: Theory and Methods. Journal of Logic Programming, 1994. 19(20): p. 629–679.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nèdellec, C., C. Rouveirol, H. Adè, F. Bergadano, and B. Tausend, Declarative Bias in ILP, in Advances in Inductive Logic Programming, L. De Raedt, Editor. 1996, IOS Press. p. 82–103.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Srinivasan, A., S. Muggleton, M.E. Sternberg, and R.D. King. Mutagenesis: ILP experiments in a non-determinate biological domain. in Fourth International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-94). 1994. Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muggleton, S. and C. Feng, Efficient Induction of logic program, in Inductive Logic Programming, S. Muggleton, Editor. 1992, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: London. p. 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, W. Pac-learning Nondeterminate Clauses. in Twelth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dzeroski, S., S. Muggleton, and S. Russell. Pac-learning of determinate logic programs. in of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory. 1992. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lavrac, N. and S. Dzeroski, Inductive Logic Programming: Techniques and Applications. Artificial intelligence. 1994: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, W. Rapid Prototyping of ILP Systems Using Explicit Bias. in IJCAI Workshop on inductive logic programming. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quinlan, J.-R., Learning Logical Definitions from Relations. Machine Learning, 1990(5): p. 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Silverstein, G. and M.J. Pazzani. Relational clich: Constraining constructive induction during relational learning. in 8th IWML. 1991: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pompe, U., I. Kokonenko, and T. Makse. An application of ILP in a musical database: Learning to compose the two-voice contrepoint. in Data Mining with Inductive Logic Programming. 1996. Bari, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pazzani, M.J., C.A. Brunk, and G. Silverstein. A knowledge intensive approach to relational concept learning. in 8th IWML. 1991: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sebag, M. and C. Rouveirol. Tractable Induction and Classification in First Order Logic. in Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'97. 1997. Nagoya, Japan: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giordana, A., F. Nen, L. Saitta, and M. Botta, Integrating multiple learning strategies in first order logics. Machine Learning, 1997. 27: p. 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muggleton, S. and A. Srinivasan, Mode-directed inverse resolution, in Machine Intelligence, Michie et al. Editors. 1994, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen, W. Learnability of Restricted Logic Programs. in IJCAI, Workshop on ILP. 1993. Chambery, France.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chaffin, R. and D. Herrmann, The nature of semantic relations, in Relational Models of the Lexicon, M. evens, Editor. 1988, Cambridge University Press:Cambridge. p. 289–334.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zucker, J.-D. and J.-G. Ganascia. Changes of Representation for Efficient Learning in Structural Domains. in International Conference in Machine Learning. 1996. Bari, Italy: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kramer, S. Stochastic propositionalization of non-determinate background knowledge. in IJCAI-97 Workshop on Frontiers of Inductive Logic Programming, 1997. 1997. Nagoya, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dietterich, T., R. Lathrop, and T. Lozano-Perez, Solving the Multiple-Instance Problem with Axis-Parallel Rectangles. Artificial Intelligence, 1996. 89(1-2).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ganascia, J.-G. CHARADE: A rule System Learning System. in the tenth International Jointed Conference in Artificial Intelligence. 1987. Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Page

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zucker, JD., Ganascia, JG. (1998). Learning structurally indeterminate clauses. In: Page, D. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1446. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027327

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027327

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64738-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69059-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics