Skip to main content

Coordination science: Challenges and directions

  • Workflow and Coordination
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications (ASIAN 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1364))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Several distinct kinds of “coordination technology” have evolved to support effective coordination in cooperative work. This paper reviews some of the major weaknesses with current coordination technology and suggests several technical directions for addressing these weaknesses. These directions include developing semi-structured process representations that explicitly capture cooperative work inter-dependencies, exploiting advanced product and software design technologies for process design, and integrating coordination technologies to synergistically combine their strengths and avoid their individual weaknesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology. In Proceedings of CSCW '92, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kosanke, K. CIMOSA: Open System Architecture for CIM, Springer Verlag (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bravoco, R.R. and Yadav, S.B. Requirements Definition Architecture — An Overview. Computers in Industry 6 (1985), 237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, D.C. Failure Handling In A Design Expert System, Butterworth and Co. (November 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clancey, W.J. Classification Problem Solving. AAAI (1984), 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dean, D.L.D., Lee, J.D.L., Orwig, R.E.O., and Vogel, D.R.V. Technological Support for Group Process Modelling. Journal of Information Management Systems 11, 3 (Winter 1994–95)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Descotte, Y. and Latombe, J.C. Making Compromises Among Antagonist Constraints In A Planner. Artificial Intelligence 27 (1985), 183–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eppinger, S.D., Whitney, D.E.W., Smith, R.P.S., and Gebala, D.A.G. A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development. Tech. Report 3569-93-MS, Working Paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, May 1993

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer, G., Lemke, A.C., McCall, R., and Morch, A.I. Making Argumentation Serve Design. Journal of Human Computer Interaction 6, 3–4 (1991), 393–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox, M.S. and Smith, S.F. ISIS — A Knowledge-Based System For Factory Scheduling. Expert Systems (July 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein, I. Bargaining Between Goals. In IJCAI, 1975, 175–180

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM 37, 1 (January 1994), 93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hewitt, C. Offices Are Open Systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4, 3 (July 1986), 271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karbe, B.H. and Ramsberger, N.G. Influence of Exception Handling on the Support of Cooperative Office Work. In Multi-User Interfaces and Applications. Elsevier Science Publishers, Gibbs, S. and Verrijin-Stuart, A.A., 355–370, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klein, M. Supporting Conflict Resolution in Cooperative Design Systems. IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics 21, 6 (December 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klein, M. iDCSS: Integrating Workflow, Conflict and Rationale-Based Concurrent Engineering Coordination Technologies. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications 3, 1 (January 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klein, M. Conflict Management as Part of an Integrated Exception Handling Approach. AI in Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing (AI EDAM) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lander, S. and Lesser, V.R. Negotiation To Resolve Conflicts Among Design Experts. Tech. Report Dept of Computer and Information Science, August 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J. and Lai, K.Y. What's In Design Rationale?. Human-Computer Interaction 6, 3–4 (1991), 251–280

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacLean, A., Young, R., Bellotti, V., and Moran, T. Questions, Options and Criteria: Elements of a Design Rationale for User Interfaces. Journal of Human Computer Interaction: Special Issue on Design Rationale 6, 3–4 (1991), 201–250

    Google Scholar 

  21. Malone, T. and Crowston, K. Towards an Interdisciplinary Theory of Coordination. Tech. Report 120, Technical report, MIT Center for Coordination Science, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marcus, S., Stout, J., and McDermott, J. VT: An Expert Elevator Designer. Artificial Intelligence Magazine 8, 4 (Winter 1987), 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mark, W. and Dukes-Schlossberg, J. Cosmos: A System for Supporting Engineering Negotiation. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications: Special Issue on Conflict Management in Concurrent Engineering II, 3 (September 1994), 173–182

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCall, R. PHIBIS: Procedurally Hierarchical Issue-Based Information Systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Planning and Design in Architecture, ASME, Boston MA, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mi, P.W. and Scacchi, W. Modelling Articulation Work in Software Engineering Processes. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Software Process, IEEE, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991, 188–201

    Google Scholar 

  26. Murata, T. Petri Nets: Properties, Analysis and Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 77, 4 (.apr 1989), 541–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peluso, E., Goldstine, J., Phoha, S., Sircar, S., Yukish, M., Licari, J., and Mayk, I. Hierarchical Supervision for the Command and Control of Interacting Automata. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Command and Control Research, June 21–23 1994

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, R.G. The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication And Control In A Distributed Problem Solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-29, 12 (December 1980), 1104–1113

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stefik, M.J. Planning With Constraints (Molgen: Part 1 & 2). Artificial Intelligence 16, 2 (1981), 111–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suchman, L.A. Office Procedures as Practical Action: Models of Work and System Design. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1, 4 (October 1983), 320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sussman, G.J. and Steele, G.L. Constraints — A Language For Expressing Almost Hierarchical Descriptions. Artificial Intelligence 14 (1980), 1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilensky, R. Planning And Understanding, Addison-Wesley (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Winograd, T. A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. In Proceedings of CSCW '86, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yakemovic, K.C.B. and Conklin, E.J. Report on a Development Project Use of an Issue-Based Information System. In CSCW 90 Proceedings, 1990, 105–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Wolfram Conen Gustaf Neumann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Klein, M. (1998). Coordination science: Challenges and directions. In: Conen, W., Neumann, G. (eds) Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications. ASIAN 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1364. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027105

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027105

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64170-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69699-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics