Abstract
The Procedural Reasoning System (PRS) is the best established agent architecture currently available. It has been deployed in many major industrial applications, ranging from fault diagnosis on the space shuttle to air traffic management and business process control. The theory of PRS-like systems has also been widely studied: within the intelligent agents research community, the belief-desire-intention (BDI) model of practical reasoning that underpins PRS is arguably the dominant force in the theoretical foundations of rational agency. Despite the interest in PRS and BDI agents, no complete attempt has yet been made to precisely specify the behaviour of real PRS systems. This has led to the development of a range of systems that claim to conform to the PRS model, but which differ from it in many important respects. Our aim in this paper is to rectify this omission. We provide an abstract formal model of an idealised dMARS system (the most recent implementation of the PRS architecture), which precisely defines the key data structures present within the architecture and the operations that manipulate these structures. We focus in particular on dMARS plans, since these are the key tool for programming dMARS agents. The specification we present will enable other implementations of PRS to be easily developed, and will serve as a benchmark against which future architectural enhancements can be evaluated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. E. Bratman, D. J. Israel, and M. E. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational intelligence, 4:349–355, 1988.
P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42:213–261, 1990.
M. d'Invemo and M. Luck. A formal specification of AgentSpeak(L). Journal of Logic and Computation, Forthcoming.
M. d'Inverno, M. Priestley, and M. Luck. A formal framework for hypertext systems. IEE Proceedings-Software Engineering Journal, 144(3):175–184, June, 1997.
E. A. Emerson and J. Y. Halpern. 'sometimes’ and ‘not never’ revisited: on branching time versus linear time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM, 33(1):151–178, 1986.
M. R. Genesereth and N. Nilsson. Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Mateo, CA, 1987.
M. P. Georgeff and A. L. Lansky. Reactive reasoning and planning. In Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87), pages 677–682, Seattle, WA, 1987.
M. P. Georgeff and A. S. Rao. A profile of the Australian AI Institute. IEEE Expert, 11(6):89–92, December 1996.
K. Hindricks, F. de Boer, W. van der Hoek, and J. Meyer, J. Formal semantics for an abstract agent programming language. In this volume.
M. Mulder, J. Treur, and M. Fisher. Agent modelling in concurrent metatem and desire. In this volume.
A. S. Rao. AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In W. Van de Velde and J. W. Perram, editors, Agents Breaking Away: Proceedings of the Seventh European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi Agent World, (LNAI Volume 1038), pages 42–55. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 1996.
A. S. Rao and M. Georgef. BDI Agents: from theory to practice. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-95), pages 312–319, San Francisco, CA, June 1995.
A. S. Rao and M. P. George. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In R. Fikes and E. Sandewall, editors, Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR&R-91), pages 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Mateo, CA, April 1991.
A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. An abstract architecture for rational agents. In C. Rich, W. Swartout, and B. Nebel, editors, Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-92), pages 439–449, 1992.
A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. Formal models and decision procedures for multi-agent systems. Technical Note 61, Australian AI Institute, Level 6, 171 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Australia, June 1995.
J. M. Spivey. The f UZZ Manual. Computing Science Consultancy, 2 Willow Close, Garsington, Oxford OX9 9AN, UK, 2nd edition, 1992.
M. Spivey. The Z Notation (second edition). Prentice Hall International: Hemel Hempstead, England, 1992.
M. Wooldridge. This is MyWorld: The logic of an agent-oriented testbed for DAI. In M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architectures, and Languages (LNAI Volume 890), pages 160–178. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, January 1995.
M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2):115–152, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
d'Inverno, M., Kinny, D., Luck, M., Wooldridge, M. (1998). A formal specification of dMARS. In: Singh, M.P., Rao, A., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds) Intelligent Agents IV Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. ATAL 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1365. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026757
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026757
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64162-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69696-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive