On the reconstruction of finite lattice sets from their X-rays

  • Peter Gritzmann
Invited Speakers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1347)

Abstract

We study various theoretical and algorithmic aspects of inverse problems in discrete tomography that are motivated by demands from material sciences for the reconstruction of crystalline structures from images produced by quantitative high resolution transmission electron microscopy.

In particular, we discuss questions related to the ill-posedness of the problem, determine the computational complexity of the basic underlying tasks and indicate algorithmic approaches in the presence of XXX-hardness.

Keywords

Travel Salesman Problem Discrete Math Reconstruction Problem Algorithmic Aspect Discrete Tomography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Aharon, G.T. Herman, and A. Kuba, Binary vectors partially determined by linear equation systems, Discrete Math. 171 (1997), 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.P. Anstee, The network flow approach for matrices with given row and column sums, Discrete Math. 44 (1983), 125–138.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Barcucci, A. Del Lungo, M. Nivat, and R. Pinzani, X-rays characterizing some classes of digital pictures, preprint.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    -, Reconstructing convex polyominoes from their horizontal and vertical projections, Th. Comput. Sci. 155 (1996), 321–347.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Bianchi and M. Longinetti, Reconstructing plane sets from projections, Discrete Comput. Geom. 5 (1990), 223–242.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Burger and P. Gritzmann, Polytopes in combinatorial optimization, Geometry at Work (C. Gorim, ed.), Math. Assoc. Amer., 1997, in print.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.K. Chang, The reconstruction of binary patterns from their projections, Comm. ACM 14 (1971), no. 1, 21–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Edmonds, Maximum matching and a polydedron with 0,1-vertices, J. Research National Bureau of Standards 69B (1965), no. 1 and 2, 125–130.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    -, Matroid intersection, Ann. Discrete Math. 4 (1979), 39–49.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.C. Fishburn, J.C. Lagarias, J. A. Reeds, and L.A. Shepp, Sets uniquely determined by projections on axes. II. discrete case, Discrete Math. 91 (1991), 149–159.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.C. Fishburn, P. Schwander, L.A. Shepp, and J. Vanderbei, The discrete Radon transform and its approximate inversion via linear programming, Discrete Appl. Math. 75 (1997), 39–62.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.J. Gardner and P. Gritzmann, Discrete tomography: Determination of finite sets by X-rays, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 349 (1997), 2271–2295.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.J. Gardner, P. Gritzmann, and D. Prangenberg, On the reconstruction of binary images from their discrete Radon transforms, Proc. Intern. Symp. Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation (Bellingham, WA), SPIE, 1996, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    —, Computational complexity issues in discrete tomography: On the reconstruction of finite lattice sets from their line X-rays, submitted; 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    —, On the computational complexity of determining polyatomic structures by X-rays, submitted, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.J. Gerbrands and C.H. Slump, A network flow approach to reconstruction of the left ventricle from two projections, Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18 (1982), 18–36.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Gritzmann and S. de Vries, Polytopes for discrete tomography, in preparation.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Gritzmann, S. de Vries, and M. Wiegelmann, On the approximate reconstruction of binary images from their discrete X-rays, in preparation, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Gritzmann, D. Prangenberg, S. de Vries, and M. Wiegelmann, Success and failure of certain reconstruction and uniqueness algorithms in discrete tomography, submitted, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Grötschel and M. Padberg, Polyhedral theory, The Traveling Salesman Problem (E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnoy Kan, and D.B. Shmoys, eds.), Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, 1985, pp. 251–305.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.W. Irving and M.R. Jerrum, Three-dimensional statistical data security problems, SIAM J. Comput. 23 (1994), 170–184.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Kisielowski, P. Schwander, F.H. Baumann, M. Seibt, Y. Kim, and A. Ourmazd, An approach to quantitative high-resolution transmission electron microscopy of crystalline materials, Ultramicroscopy 58 (1995), 131–155.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Korte and D. Hausmann, An analysis of the greedy heuristic for independence systems, Ann. Discrete Math. 2 (1978), 65–74.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Naddef, The Hirsch conjecture is true for (0,1)-polytopes, Math. Prog. 45 (1989), 109–110.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Padberg and M. Grötschel, Polyhedral computations, The Traveling Salesman Problem (E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnoy Kan, and D.B. Shmoys, eds.), Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, 1985, pp. 307–360.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Rényi, On projections of probability distributions, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 3 (1952), 131–142.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H.J. Ryser, Combinatorial properties of matrices of zeros and ones, Canad. J. Math. 9 (1957), 371–377.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    -, Combinatorial mathematics, Mathem. Assoc. Amer. and Quinn & Boden, Rahway, NJ, 1963.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Schwander, C. Kisielowski, M. Seibt, F.H. Baumann, Y. Kim, and A. Ourmazd, Mapping projected potential, interfacial roughness, and composition in general crystalline solids by quantitative transmission electron microscopy, Physical Review Letters 71 (1993), 4150–4153.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y. Vardi and D. Lee, The discrete Radon transform and its approximate inversion via the ELM algorithm, preprint, 1997.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C.J. Woeginger, The reconstruction of polyominoes from their orthogonal projections, preprint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Gritzmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Zentrum MathematikTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations