Advertisement

Physical effects of instantons

  • Claude Bernard
Invited Papers
  • 137 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 129)

Keywords

Saddle Point Saddle Point Approximation Dense Configuration Instanton Size Important Physical Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. 't Hooft, Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 3432.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Bernard, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979) 3013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Callan, R. Dashen, and D. Gross, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 2717.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Andrei and D. Gross, Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 468.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Baulieu, J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and W. J. Zakrezewski, Phys. Lett. 77B (1978) 290.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Appelquist and R. Shankar, Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 2952.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Other treatments, which we do not discuss here, include R. Carlitz and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 3238 and M. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. 76B (1978) 466.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Callan, R. Dashen, and D. Gross, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979) 1826.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Callan, R. Dashen, and D. Gross, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 2526; D. Caldi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 121; R. Carlitz, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 3225.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974) 461.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Witten, “Instantons, the Quark Model, and the 1/N Expansion,” Harvard preprint HUTP-78/A042 (1978) and “Current Algebra Theorems for the U(1) Goldstone Boson,” HUTP-79/A014 (1979).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Berg and M. Lüscher, “Computations of Quantum Fluctuations Around Multi-Instanton Fields from Exact Green's Functions: the CPn-1 Case,” DESY preprint, March 1979.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. A. Fateev, I. V. Frolov, and A. S. Schwarz, ITEP preprint, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Bernard, N. Christ, A. Guth, and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2967.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. R. Ore, Jr., Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 2577; S. Chadha, A. D'Adda, P. DiVecchia, and F. Nicodemi, Phys. Lett. 72B (1977) 103.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Gervais and B. Sakita, Phys. Rev. Dll (1975) 2943; E. Tomboulis, ibid. 12 (1978) 1678.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. 't Hooft, Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 2199.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu. Bashilov and S. Pakrovski, Nuc. Phys. B143 (1978) 431.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    This can be proved in the classical case, at least, by a conformal transformation. See [3].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Brown, R. Carlitz, D. Creamer, and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 1583.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    The results of [4] have been adjusted for the change in the parameter b.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Although the sign of the added term in (35) appears to be the conventional one, it is produced, in fact, from the cancellation of two changes of sign with subtle origins:(a) There is a minus sign coming from the fact that we are really doing magnetostatics in four dimensions. This means we should start with the thermodynamic potentials involving B and H in which the role of external field and total field are interchanged.(b) There is a minus sign coming from the fact that D is the external electric field produced by quark charges in Minkowski space, which becomes imaginary in Euclidean space.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Callan, R. Dashen, D. Gross, “Instantons as a Bridge between Weak and Strong Coupling in QCD,” Princeton preprint, August 1979.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Carlitz and D. Creamer, “Instanton Induced Interactions,” Pittsburgh preprint PITT-208 (1979).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Koplik, A. Neveu, and S. Nussinov, Nuc. Phys. B123 (1977) 109.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Differences between (24) and [26] and [18] do not change this conclusion.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Jevicki, “Collective Behavior of Instantons in QCD,” Institute for Advanced Study preprint, June 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claude Bernard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations