Skip to main content

Superposition with simplification as a decision procedure for the monadic class with equality

  • Contributed Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logic and Proof Theory (KGC 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 713))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We show that superposition, a restricted form of paramodulation, can be combined with specifically designed simplification rules such that it becomes a decision procedure for the monadic class with equality. The completeness of the method follows from a general notion of redundancy for clauses and superposition inferences.

The research described in this paper was supported in part by the German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) under grant Ga 261/4-1, by the German Ministry for Research and Technology (Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie) under grant ITS 9102/ITS 9103 and by the ESPRIT Basic Research Working Group 6028 (Construction of Computational Logics).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • W. Ackermann, 1954. Solvable Cases of the Decision Problem. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Aiken and E. L. Wimmers, 1992. Solving Systems of Set Constraints (Extended Abstract). In Seventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Santa Cruz, California, USA, pp. 329–340. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bachmair and H. Ganzinger, 1990. On Restrictions of Ordered Paramodulation with Simplification. In M. E. Stickel, editor, 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Kaiserslautern, FRG, LNAI 449, pp. 427–441. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bachmair and H. Ganzinger, 1991. Rewrite-Based Equational Theorem Proving With Selection and Simplification. Technical Report MPI-I-91-208, Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken. Revised version to appear in Journal of Logic and Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bachmair, H. Ganzinger and U. Waldmann, 1992. Set Constraints are the Monadic Class. Technical Report MPI-I-92-240, Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken. Revised version to appear in Eighth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Montreal, Canada, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Comon, M. Haberstrau and J.-P. Jouannaud, 1992. Decidable Problems in Shallow Equational Theories (Extended Abstract). In Seventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Santa Cruz, California, USA, pp. 255–265. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Dershowitz and J.-P. Jouannaud, 1990. Rewrite Systems. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, volume B: Formal Models and Semantics, chapter 6, pp. 243–320. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Dreben and W.D. Goldfarb, 1979. The Decision Problem. Solvable Classes of Quantificational Formulas. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Fermüller, A. Leitsch, T. Tammet and N. Zamov, 1992. Resolution Methods for the Decision Problem. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Fermüller and G. Salzer, 1993. Ordered Paramodulation and Resolution as Decision Procedure. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Heintze and J. Jaffar, 1991. Set-based program analysis. Draft manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. H. Joyner Jr., 1976. Resolution Strategies as Decision Procedures. Journal of the ACM, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 398–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. R. Lewis, 1980. Complexity Results for Classes of Quantificational Formulas. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, Vol. 21, pp. 317–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Löwenheim, 1915. Über Möglichkeiten im Relativkalkül. Math. Annalen, Vol. 76, pp. 228–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Nieuwenhuis and A. Rubio, 1992. Theorem Proving with Ordering Constrained Clauses. In D. Kapur, editor, 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA, LNAI 607, pp. 477–491. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Nivela and R. Nieuwenhuis, 1993. Practical results on saturation of full first-order clauses: Experiments with the Saturate system. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rusinowitch, 1989. Démonstration Automatique: Techniques de Réécriture. Intereditions, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rusinowitch, 1991. Theorem proving with resolution and superposition: An extension of the Knuth and Bendix completion procedure as a complete set of inference rules. Journal of Symbolic Computation, Vol. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Georg Gottlob Alexander Leitsch Daniele Mundici

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H., Waldmann, U. (1993). Superposition with simplification as a decision procedure for the monadic class with equality. In: Gottlob, G., Leitsch, A., Mundici, D. (eds) Computational Logic and Proof Theory. KGC 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 713. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022557

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0022557

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57184-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47943-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics