Skip to main content

Natural and artificial flying machines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives in Fluid Mechanics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 320))

  • 199 Accesses

Abstract

The advent of fossil-fuel engines has provided aeronautical engineers with a ten-fold to hundred-fold increase in power-to-gross-weight ratios over the ratios available for biologically-powered flight creations, such as birds and human-powered aircraft. The tremendous achievements of engine-powered aircraft over the past eight decades have tended to obscure the fact that numerous flight problems had already been elegantly solved by birds many tens of millions of years ago. Recent projects in human-powered aircraft, in bird aerodynamics, and in the development of a flying replica of a 11-m span pterodactyl have introduced us to the bird-airplane interface. The result has been an increasing respect for “Mother Nature the Engineer,” who derived efficient evolutionary solutions for all of the factors involved in biological flight. Engineers and scientists also have much to learn from nature regarding aeroelasticity as a factor in tailoring structures to the varied demands of flight, including active-control technology, boundary-layer control, and navigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Symposium on Swimming and Flying in Nature, Proceedings of the Caltech Symposium of July, 1974, edited by T.Y. Wu (Plenum Press, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.M. Kuethe, “Prototypes in nature; the carry-over into technology,” Technical Engineering Review, University of Michigan, Spring, 3–20, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.H. McMasters, “Reflections of a paleoaerodynamicist,” AIAA 2nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Seattle, Paper No. 84-2167, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.H. Woodcock, “Soaring over the open ocean,” Soaring 6, Nov.–Dec. (1942), reprinted from Scientific Monthly 1942, Sept.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.B. MacCready, “Soaring bird aerodynamics — clues for hang gliding,” Ground Skimmer 1976, Oct.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.B. MacCready, “Flight on 0.33 Horsepower: The Gossamer Condor,” AIAA 14th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Paper No. 78–308, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.B. MacCready, “Flight of the Gossamer Condor,” Science Year, World Book, (Childcraft International, 1979), pp. 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.D. Burke, “The Gossamer Condor and Albatross: A case study in aircraft design” (AIAA Professional Study Series), AeroVironment, Inc., Report AV-R80/540, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Grosser, Gossamer Odyssey (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. “Children of Icarus,” Nova, Adventures in Science (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.B. MacCready, “Soaring aerodynamics of frigate birds,” Soaring 48, July, 20–22 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Langston, Jr., “Pterosaurs,” Scientific American 244, Feb., 122–136 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C.J. Pennycuick, “Gliding flight of the white-backed vulture gyps africaur” J. Exp. Biol. 55, 13–38 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. J. Pennycuick, “Mechanisms of flight,” Aviation Biology, edited by Farner and King, Chap. 1 (Academic Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V.A. Tucker and G.C. Parrott, “Aerodynamics of gliding flight in a falcon and other birds," J. Exp. Biol. 52, 345–367 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C.J. Pennycuick, “Thermal soaring compared in three dissimilar tropical bird species; fregata magnificens, pellecanus occidentelis and corigype atralus,” J. Exp. Biol. 102, 307–325 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Eggleston and D. Surry, “The development of new A/2 airfoils aided by computer,” Proc. National Free Flight Symp., 127–134 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.H. Carmichael, “Update on high performance model airfoils,” National Free Flight Symp., Rep. 34–41, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.S. Pressnell and M.S.B. Bakin, “Airfoil turbulator and navigators,” in Proc. National Free Flight Symp., 103–109 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Dilly, “Special award — Gyorgy Benedeks airfoils,” in Proc. National Free Flight Symp., 82–83 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Wainfan, “Design of free flight airfoils for minimum sink,” National Free Flight Symp., Rep. 9–13, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C.J.V. Rees, “Form and function in corrugated desert wings,” Nature 256, 201–203 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. P.B. MacCready, P.B.S. Lissaman, and W.R. Morgan, “Sun-powered aircraft designs,” J. Aircraft 20, 487–493 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.T. Jones, “Safety of slow flying aircraft,” Sport Aviation 1984, March.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.J. Pennycuick and D. Webbe, “Observations on the fulmar in Spitsbergen,” British Birds 52, 321–332 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Donald Coles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Spring-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

MacCready, P.B. (1988). Natural and artificial flying machines. In: Coles, D. (eds) Perspectives in Fluid Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 320. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0021116

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0021116

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-50644-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46061-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics