Skip to main content

Case memory and the behaviouristic model of concepts and cognition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1168))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Since the advent of case-based reasoning (CBR) in the early eighties, two schools seem to have emerged: One that is more concerned with the cognitive aspects of CBR, and another, arguably more applied school, which views CBR as an AI ‘workhorse’, as it were, that can provide solutions to real-world problems. The former school is sometimes associated with the US, and the latter with Europe. This work, to some extent, attempts to reconcile the two camps. It proposes the behaviouristic or cognitive (as opposed to metaphysical) concept notion as conceptual framework for CBR. It does so by reviewing the three most intensely researched concept models, and relating them to the CBR paradigm. Two of the more recently evolved concept views—the probabilistic exemplar and prototype view—are then put forward as epistemologically sound foundation to model a memory of cases. Extending this core model by means of a complementary possibilistic dimension, a rich and flexible case-knowledge representation framework is developed that addresses issues like expressiveness, extendibility, context effects, and uncertainty. This scheme is called PERCEPT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.L. Kolodner, K.C. Riesbeck. Experience, Memory, and Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.L. Kolodner. Case-Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., CA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.E. Smith, E.J. Shoben, L.J. Rips. Structure and Process in Semantic Memory: A Featural Model for Semantic Decisions. Psychological Review, 81, pp214–241, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.E. Smith, D.L. Medin. Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.C. Schank. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge University Press, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.L. Kolodner. Retrieval and Organizational Strategies in Conceptual Memory. Hillsdale, N.J., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.J. Hammond. Case-Based Planning: Viewing Planning as a Memory Task. Academic Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ram A. Indexing, Elaboration and Refinement: Incremental Learning of Explanatory Cases., Machine Learning, 10(3):201–248, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Bareiss, B. Porter, C. Wier. PROTOS—An Exemplar-Eased Learning Apprentice. 2nd Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Porter, R. Barreiss, R. Holte. Concept Learning and Heuristic Classification in Weak Theory Domains. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 45 (1–2), pp229–263, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.S. Aikins. Prototypical Knowledge for Expert Systems, Artificial Intelligence vol. 20, pp163–210, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Aamodt. A Knowledge-Intensive Approach to Problem Solving and Sustained Learning. PhD dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Aamodt. Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AICOM, vol. 7, 1, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Cheng. Context-Dependent Similarity. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6, vol. 12, pp41–47, North-Holland, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.E. Stepp, R.S. Michalski. Conceptual Clustering of Structured objects: A Goal-Oriented Approach. Artificial Intelligence, 28, pp43–69, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Tversky. Features of Similarity. Psychological Review, vol. 84, pp327–252, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ruspini, E.H., “Possibility as Similarity: The Semantics of Fuzzy Logic”, in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6, pp271, North-Holland, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klir, G.J., T.A. Folger, Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty and Information, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S-J. Chen, C-L. Hwang. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications, Springer Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.A. Miller. The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Seven. Psychological Review, vol. 6, 3, pp81, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Dubitzky, A. Schuster, J.G. Hughes, D.A. Bell. Conceptual Distance of Numerically Specified Case Features. 2nd New Zealand International Two-Stream Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems, pp210–213, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Schuster, W. Dubitzky, K. Adamson, J.G. Hughes, D.A. Bell. Processing Similarity between a Mix of Crisply and Fuzzily Defined Case Features. submitted to Second International ICSC Symposium on Fuzzy Logic and Applications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Dubitzky. Uncertainty Management in Case-Based Reasoning: A Concept-Centred Approach, PhD thesis, to be submitted by autumn 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ian Smith Boi Faltings

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dubitzky, W., Hughes, J.G., Bell, D.A. (1996). Case memory and the behaviouristic model of concepts and cognition. In: Smith, I., Faltings, B. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1168. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020606

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020606

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61955-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49568-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics