Skip to main content

Towards CBR for bioprocess planning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1168))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present the current status of a recipe planner for bioprocesses. This case-based reasoner adapts previously successful recipes for each batch of the process. In this domain, recipe planning is difficult as actual numerical values of recipe parameters are crucial but quantitative information is scarce. However, adaptation, although far from trivial, is less complicated than planning from scratch. Like other case-based reasoners the system learns from experience, whenever the casebase grows. Therefore we expect that planners will automatically tune themselves to different plants. Case adaptation is fully automatic; process operators were never trained for this task. For adaptation, the case-based reasoner calls upon a semi-qualitative model of the process. The model, casebase and index are integrated and allow for indexing on inferences made by the model. All the software is implemented in an object-oriented framework that can be rapidly instantiated for different processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aamodt, A. (1994). Explanation-driven case-based reasoning, In S. Wess, K. Althoff, M. Richter (eds.): Topics in Case-based reasoning. Springer Verlag, pp 274–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarts, R. J. (1992). Knowledge-based systems for bioprocesses. Technical Research Centre of Finland, Publications 120, 116 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarts, R. J., Sjöholm, K., Home, S. & Pietilä, K. (1993). Computer-planned mashing. Proc. of the European Brewery Convention Congress, Oslo, 1993, pp. 655–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts, L. K. (1993). YMIR: an ontology for engineering design, PhD-thesis, ISBN 90-9006128-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, S., Goel, A. & Prabhakar, S. (1994). Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model-Based Approach. Proc. of the Third International Conference on AI in Design, Aug. 1994, Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, G. F. (1994). Learning to plan in continuous domains. Artificial Intelligence 65:71–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbus, K.D. (1984). Qualitative Process Theory. Artificial Intelligence 24: 85–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., Chionglo, J.F., & Fadel, F.G. (1993). A Common Sense Model of the Enterprise. Proceedings of the 2nd Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Norcross GA: Institute for Industrial Engineers, pp. 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. R. (1991). The Role of Common Ontology in Achieving Sharable, Reusable Knowledge Bases. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, Cambridge, MA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp. 601–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K. (1990). Explaining and Repairing Plans That Fail. Artificial Intelligence, 45:173–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K., Converse, T. & Marks, M. (1993). Toward a Theory of Agency. In: Machine Learning Methods for Planning, Minton, S. (ed), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Diego, pp. 351–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, J.D., Branting, L.K. & Lockwood, J.A. (1995), Case Adaptation Using an Incomplete Causal Model. In: Veloso, M. & Aamodt, A. (Eds.): Case-based reasoning research and development: 1st Intl. Conf. ICCBR-95, Sesimbra, Portugal, Oct. 1995, Springer, pp. 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E. & Russo, V. F. (1991) Reusing Object Oriented Designs. University of Illinois tech. report UIUCDCS 91-1696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo CA, 668 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koton, P. (1989). Using experience in learning and problem solving. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Computer Science (Ph.D. diss., October 1988),MIT/LCS/TR-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousu, J. & Aarts, R.J. (1996). Adaptation Cost as a Criterion for Solution Evaluation. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K., Guttal, R., Koning, J., Narasimhan, S. & Navinchandra, D. (1992) CADET: a Case-based Synthesis Tool for Engineering Design, Intl. J. Expert Systems, 4:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdenius, F. (1997). Managing Product Inherent Variance During Treatment. Accepted for publication in: Computers & Electronics in Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ian Smith Boi Faltings

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aarts, R.J., Rousu, J. (1996). Towards CBR for bioprocess planning. In: Smith, I., Faltings, B. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1168. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020599

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020599

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61955-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49568-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics