Skip to main content

Neural network technology to support view integration

  • Non-Traditional Modeling Approaches
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
OOER '95: Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modeling (ER 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1021))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The most difficult and time consuming activity to perform during view integration is to find correspondences between different view specifications. Such correspondences may be the source for conflicts when integrating the views and thus must be detected and resolved. A manual inspection of the class definitions in each view and a comparison with each class definition in the other views may result in an almost endless process. To support a designer we propose a computerized tool to extract the semantics from view definitions, to transform them into a unique vector representation of each class, and to use the class vectors to train a neural network in order to determine categories of classes. The output of the tool is a ‘first guess’ which concepts in views may be overlapping or which concepts do not overlap at all. This may be of tremendous value because the designers are relieved from manual inspection of all the classes and can direct their focus on classes grouped into the same category.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Bouzeghoub, I. Comyn-Wattiau. View Integration by Semantic Unification and Transformation of Data Structures. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on the Entity-Relationship Approach, North Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, S. B. Navathe. A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 18, No 4, pp. 323–364, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Biskup, B. Convent. A Formal View Integration Method. Proc. ACM Int. Conf. on Managment of Data (Sigmod), Washington, DC, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Bright, A Hurson. A Taxonomy and Current Issues in Multidatabase Systems. IEEE Computer, Vol 24, No. 10, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. P. Chen. The Entity-Relationship Model — Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Trans. on Database Systems (ToDS), Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 9–36, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Date. An Introduction to Database Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Fankhauser, M. Kracker, E. Neuhold. Semantic vs. Structural Resemblance of Classes. ACM Sigmod Record, Vol. 20, No. 4, Dec. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Johannesson. A Logical Basis for Schema Integration. Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering (RIDE), IEEE Comp. Society Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Johannesson. Using Conceptual Graph Theory to Support Schema Integration. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on the Entity-Relationship Approach, Springer Verlag, LNCS 823, 1994. (R. Elmasri, V. Kouramajian, B. Thalheim, Eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Kohonen. The Self-Organizing Map. Proceedings of the IEEE 78(9). 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Kohonen. Self-Organizing Maps. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. A. Larson, S. B. Navathe, R. Elmasri. A Theory of Attribute Equivalence in Databases with Applications to Schema Integration. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering (ToSE). Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 449–463, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.-S. Li, C. Clifton. Semantic Integration in Heterogeneous Databases Using Neural Networks. Proc. 20th VLDB Conference, Santiago, Chile, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Mehra and B. J. Wah (Eds.). Artificial Neural Networks: Concepts and Theory. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Motro. Superviews: Virtual Integration of Multiple Databases. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering (ToSE). Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 785–798, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. B. Navathe, S. G. Gadgil. A Methodology for View Integration in Logical Database Design. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on the Entity-Relationship Approach, North Holland, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Rumbaugh, et al. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. W. Song, P. Johannesson, J. Bubenko. Semantic Similarity Relations in Schema Integration. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on the Entity-Relationship Approach, Springer Verlag, LNCS 645, 1992. (G. Pernul, A M. Tjoa, Eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Spaccapietra, C. Parant, Y. Dupont. Model Independent Assertions for Integration of Heterogeneous Schemes. The VLDB Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 81–126, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Michael P. Papazoglou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ellmer, E., Huemer, C., Merk, D., Pernu, G. (1995). Neural network technology to support view integration. In: Papazoglou, M.P. (eds) OOER '95: Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modeling. ER 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1021. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020531

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020531

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60672-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48527-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics