Skip to main content

A model for orientation tuning and contextual effects of orientation selective receptive fields

  • Part II: Cortical Maps and Receptive Fields
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN'97 (ICANN 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1327))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate a mean-field model which has previously been used to explain the response properties of orientation selective neurons in the primary visual cortex of monkeys and cats [2]. Two mutually coupled orientation hypercolumns are setup as local amplifiers based on local recurrent excitation and inhibition. We first investigate the individual hypercolumns. The model correctly predicts contrast invariant tuning, but analytical and numerical results show that the contrast response functions of individual orientation columns do not saturate. We therefore hypothesize that the cortical saturation effects found experimentally may be a consequence of the non-linear properties of single neurons rather than being an effect of different gains for inhibitory and excitatory cells [13]. We then extend this model to cover non-classical receptive fields and contextual effects. The model correctly predicts effective iso-orientation inhibition between hypercolumns. As long as parameters are chosen to ensure contrast invariant orientation tuning, however, net cross-orientation facilitation emerges only, if cells of different orientation preference are connected across hypercolumns. These results hint at deficiencies of this simple approach and suggest that contextual effects are mediated by populations of neurons, which are not take part of the local gain control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. G. Albrecht and D. B. Hamilton. Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. J. Neurophysiol., 48:217–237, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Ben-Yishai, R. Lev Bar-Or, and H. Sompolinski. Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92:3844–3848, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Blakemore and E. A. Tobin. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. Exp. Brain Res., 15:439–440, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. C. DeAngelis, J. G. Robson, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman. Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 68:144–163, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. D. Gilbert and T. N. Wiesel. The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat. Vision Res., 30:1689–1701, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. B. Levitt and J. S. Lund. Contrast dependence of contexual effects in primate visual cortex. Nature, 387:73–76, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. A. McCormick, B. W. Connors, J. E. Lighthall, and D. A. Prince. Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. J. Neurophysiol., 54(4):782–806, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Mundel, A. Dimitrov, and J. Cowan. A simple model for cortical orientation selectivity. In G. Tesauro et al., editors, NIPS. MIT Press, 1996. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Pawelzik, U. Ernst, F. Wolf, and T. Geisel. Orientation contrast sensitivity from long-range interactions in visual cortex. In G. Tesauro et al., editors, NIPS. MIT Press, 1996. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. M. Sillito, K. L. Grieve, H. E. Jones, J. Cudeiro, and J. Davis. Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal discontinuities. Nature, 378:492–496, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. C. Skottun, A. Bradley, G. Sclar, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman. The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behaviour. J. Neurophysiol., 57:773–786, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. C. Somers, S. B. Nelson, and M. Sur. An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells. J. Neurosci., 15:5448–5465, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Todorov, A. Siapas, and D. Somers. A model of recurrent interactions in primary visual cortex. In T. Leen G. Tesauro, D. Touretzky, editor, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8. MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Yoshioka, G. G. Blasdel, J. B. Levitt, and J. S. Lund. Relation between patterns of intrinsic lateral connectivity, ocular dominance and cytochrome oxidase-reactive regions in macaque monkey striate cortex. Cereb. Cortex, page in press., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Wulfram Gerstner Alain Germond Martin Hasler Jean-Daniel Nicoud

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bartsch, H., Stetter, M., Obermayer, K. (1997). A model for orientation tuning and contextual effects of orientation selective receptive fields. In: Gerstner, W., Germond, A., Hasler, M., Nicoud, JD. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN'97. ICANN 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020162

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020162

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63631-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69620-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics