Advertisement

How a single Purkinje cell could learn the adaptive timing of the classically conditioned eye-blink response

  • Volker Steuber
  • David J. Willshaw
Part I: Coding and Learning in Biology
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1327)

Abstract

Experimental evidence supports the view that the cerebellum is involved in the adaptive timing of the classically conditioned eyeblink response. Previous modelling studies have demonstrated that a group of cerebellar Purkinje cells can learn the adaptive timing of the eye-blink response if the cells in the group have predefined response latencies which cover the range of conditionable interstimulus intervals (ISIS). Here we show how the timing can be learnt by a single Purkinje cell. Phosphorylation of metabotropic glutamate recptors (mGluRs) in our model causes the time delay between parallel fibre input and voltage response to be adaptive and makes it unnecessary to specify a conditionable ISI for each cell in advance. The model is able to learn conditioned responses (CRs) for delay conditioned ISIs between 200 and 1000 msec. Modification of parts of the intracellular signalling network might represent a general mechanism for neurons to learn the timing between input and output.

Keywords

Conditioned Stimulus Purkinje Cell Unconditioned Stimulus Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Adaptive Timing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McCormick, D.A., Thompson, R.F. (1984). Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during aquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membrane-eyelid response. J. Neurosci. 4: 2811–2822.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCormick, D.A., Clark, G.A., Lavond, D.G., Thompson, R.F. (1982). Initial localization of the memory trace for a basic form of learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 2731–2735.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson, R.F., Krupa, D.J. (1994). Organization of memory traces in the mammalian brain. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 17: 519–549.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fiala, J.C., Grossberg, S., Bullock, D. (1996). Metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the classically conditioned eye-blink response. J. Neurosci. 16: 3760–3774.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gormezano, I. (1966). Classical Conditioning. In: Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (Sidowski, J.B. ed.), 385–420. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinmetz, J.E. (1990). Classical nictitating membrane conditioning in rabbits with varying interstimulus intervals and direct activation of cerebellar mossy fibres as the CS. Behav. Brain Res. 38: 97–108.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawabata, S., Tsutsumi, R., Kohara, A., Yamaguchi, T., Nakanishi, S., Okada, M. (1996). Control of calcium oscillations by phosphorylation of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nature 383: 89–92.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, X., Robinson, P.J. (1995). Cyclic GMP dependent protein kinase substrates in rat brain. J. Neurochem. 65: 595–603.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tegge, W., Frank, R., Hofmann, F., Dostmann, W.R.G. (1995). Determination of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase substrate specificity by the use of peptide libraries on cellulose paper. Biochemistry 34: 10569–10577.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Steuber
    • 1
  • David J. Willshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Neural Systems, Centre for Cognitive ScienceEdinburgh UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations