Advertisement

Concurrent parallel-sequential processing in gamma controlled cortical-type networks of spiking neurones

  • Edgar Koerner
  • Ursula Koerner
Part I: Coding and Learning in Biology
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1327)

Abstract

In sensory recognition, rapid activation of an initial hypothesis based on few but reliably detected features, and the discrimination of the object by refined analysis of the sensory input are two conflicting requirements. We show that these two aspects of sensory recognition can be optimally served by a neocortical firmware model, the stereotypically structured columnar architecture, and that the resulting ensemble temporal encoding performed by such a modular unit enables both rapid and robust recognition by utilisation of the dimension of time to encode the reliability of a decision. The model suggests a novel functional interpretation of gamma oscillations in cortical processing.

Keywords

Initial Hypothesis Partial Match Gamma Oscillation Columnar Module Spike Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Celebrini, S. Thorpe, Y. Trotter & M. Imbert. Dynamics of orientation coding in area V l of the awake primate. Visual Neuroscience 10 (1993): 811–825Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.J. Douglas & K.A.C. Martin. A functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 440, (1991): 735–769Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.J. Hopfield. Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation. Nature 376 (1995): 33–36Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Koerner, H. Tsujino & T. Masutani. A cortical-type modular neural network for hypothetical reasoning. Neural Networks (in press)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Llinas & U. Ribary. Coherent 40-Hz oscillation characterizes dream state in humans. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA, 90 (March 1993): 2078–2081Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.G. Nowak, M.H.J. Munk, P. Girard & J. Bullier. Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. Visual Neuroscience 12 (1995): 371–384Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.W. Oram & D.I. Perret. Time course of neural-responses discriminating different views of the face and the head. Journal of Neurophysiology 68 (1992): 70–84Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Thorpe, D. Fize & C. Marlot. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381 (1996): 520–522Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Vaadia, I. Haalman, M. Abeles, H. Bergman,Y. Prut, H. Slovin& A.Aertsen. Dynamics of neuronal interactions in monkey cortex in relation to behavioral events. Nature 373 (1995): 515–518Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Wang, K. Tanaka & M. Tanifuji. Optical imaging of functional organization in the monkey temporal cortex. Science 272 (1996): 1665–1668Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.A. Whittington, R. D. Traub & J.G.R. Jeffreys. Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks. Nature 373 (1995): 612–615Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edgar Koerner
    • 1
  • Ursula Koerner
    • 1
  1. 1.Future Technology DivisionHONDA R&D Europe (Germany) Ltd.Offenbach/MainGermany

Personalised recommendations