This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourrón, C.E., and Makinson, D. (1982). The logic of theory change: contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Theoria, 48, 14–37.
Fuhrmann, A. (1988). Relevant logics, modal logics and theory change. PhD thesis, Australian National University.
Fuhrmann, A. (forthcoming). Theory contraction through base contraction. Journal of Philosophical Logic.
Gärdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford-MIT.
Hansson, S.O. (forthcoming) New operators for theory change. Theoria.
Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Makinson, D. (1987). On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change. Journal of Philosophical logic, 16, 383–394.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Niederée, R. (1991). Multiple contraction a further case against gärdenfors' principle of recovery. In: Fuhrmann, A., Morreau, M. (eds) The Logic of Theory Change. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 465. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018427
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018427
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53567-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46817-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive