Abstract
The effectiveness of any tool, whether workflow or not depends on the how well it co-exists with the processes it supports. If it is congruent with those processes, then there's a chance that it enhance them. If not then it may be a severe hindrance.
HyperCode automates several aspects of the current manual process and so is prima facae consistent with the process it supports. In fact, the initial response from users has so been overwhelmingly positive that it's difficult to constrain the tool's use to fit our experimental design. We attribute this response to two things: first, the elimination of the paper as the medium, and second, the elimination of synchronous interactions.
We also notice, however, scheduling difficulties, physical distance between reviewers, and physical distance between developers who must negotiate the repair of defects appears to affect the benefits of the tool. The exact extent to which this tool works, therefore, must be assessed via our rigorous experiments.
This work is supported in part by a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development Award, CCR-9501354.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
“IEEE Standard for software reviews and audits”. IEEE Std 1028-1988, Soft. Eng. Tech. Comm. of the IEEE Computer Society, 1989.
Adam A. Porter and Lawrence G. Votta and Harvey P. Siy and Carol A. Toman. “An Experiment to Assess the Cost-Benefits of Code Inspections in Large Scale Software Development”. The Third International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering Washington, D.C., October 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Perry, D.E., Porter, A., Votta, L.G., Wade, M.W. (1996). Evaluating workflow and process automation in wide-area software development. In: Montangero, C. (eds) Software Process Technology. EWSPT 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017744
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017744
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61771-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70676-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive