Advertisement

Chemical trends in organic conductors: Stabilization of the nearly one-dimensional metallic state

  • A. N. Bloch
V. Experimental Investigations on TTF-TCNQ and its Derivatives
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 65)

Keywords

Optical Conductivity Excess Noise American Physical Society Organic Conductor Chemical Trend 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1(a).
    Reviews include I. F. Schegolev, Phys. Stat. Sol. (A), 12, 9 (1972); (b). A. N. Bloch, in Energy and Charge Transfer in Organic Semiconductors, edited by K. Masuda and M. Silver (Plenum Press, New York, 1974), p. 159; (c) A. N. Bloch, D. O. Cowan, and T. O. Poehler, in Energy and Charge Transfer in Organic Semiconductors, edited by K. Masuda and M. Silver (Plenum Press, New York, 1974), p. 167; (d) A. F. Garito and A. J. Heeger, Accounts Chem. Res., 7, 232 (1974); (e) A. J. Berlinsky, Contemp. Phys., 17, 331 (1976); (f) D. 0. Cowan, P. Shu, C. Hu, W. Krug, T. Carruthers, T. Poehler, and A. Bloch, in Proceedings of the NATO Conference on the Chemistry and Physics of One-Dimensional Metals, Bolzano, Italy, ed. H. J. Keller (Plenum Press, New York, 1977), in press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. K. S. Shante, A. N. Bloch, D. O. Cowan, W. M. Lee, S. Choi, and M. H. Cohen, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc., 21, 287 (1976); and to be published.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. J. Berlinsky, J. F. Carolan, and L. Weiler, Sol. St. Comm., 15, 795 (1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See, for example, M. H. Cohen, J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 2, 432 (1970)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z. G. Soos, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 25, 121 (1974).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. F. Williams and A. N. Bloch, Phys. Rev., B10, 1097 (1974).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    For a review, see F. H. Herbstein, in Perspectives in Structural Chemistry, edited by J. D. Dunitz and J. A. Ibers (Wiley, New York, 1972), Vol. IV, p. 166.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. E. Peierls, Quantum Theory of Solids (Oxford Press, London, 1955), p. 108.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See, for example, B. I. Halperin, Adv. Chem. Phys., 13, 123 (1966).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, Statistical Physics (Pergamon Press, New York, 1958), p. 482.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Ferraris, D. O. Cowan, V. Walatka, and J. H. Perlstein, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 95, 498 (1973).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. N. Bloch, D. O. Cowan, K. Bechgaard, R. E. Pyle, and R. H. Banks, Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 1561 (1975).Google Scholar
  13. 13.(a)
    S. Etemad, T. Penney, E. M. Engler, B. A. Scott, and P. E. Seiden, Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 741 (1975)Google Scholar
  14. 13(b).
    Y. Tomkiewicz, E. M. Engler, and T. D. Schultz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 456 (1975)Google Scholar
  15. 13(c).
    S. Etemad, Phys. Rev., B13, 2254 (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    G. Beni, Sol. St. Comm., 15, 269 (1974).Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    D. J. Scalapino, Y. Imry, and P. Pincus, Phys. Rev., B11, 2042 (1975).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    See, for example, P. A. Lee, T. M. Rice, and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett., 31, 462 (1973).Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    M. H. Cohen, J. A. Hertz, P. M. Horn, and V. K. S. Shante, Int. J. Quant. Chem. Symp., No. 8, 491 (1974).Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    U. Bernstein, P. M. Chaikin, and P. Pincus, Phys. Rev, Lett., 34, 271 (1975).Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    T. J. Kistenmacher, T. E. Phillips, and D. O. Cowan, Acta Cryst., B30, 763 (1974)Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    F. Denoyer, R. Comes, A. F. Garito, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 445 (1975); R. Comes, S, M. Shapiro, G. Shirane, A, F. Garito, and A. J, Heeger, Phys. Rev, Lett., 35, 1518 (1975); S. Kagoshima, H, Anzai,.:. Majimura, and T, Ishigoro, J, Phys. Soc. Japan, 39, 1143 (1975); R, Comes, in Proceedings of the NATO Conference on the Chemistry and Physics of One-Dimensional Metals, Bolzano, Italy, ed. H. J. Keller (Plenum Press, New York, 1977), in press.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    A similar interpretation of this material has been conceived independently by M. Weger, Sol. St. Comm. 19, 1149 (1976). See also Refs. 31 and 49.Google Scholar
  24. 22.
    J. P. Ferraris, T. O. Poehler, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, Tet. Lett., 27, 2553 (1976).Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    T. E. Phillips, T. J. Kistenmacher, A. N. Bloch, J. P. Ferraris, and D. O. Cowan, Acta. Cryst. (in press).Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    M. A. Butler, J. P. Ferraris, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, Chem. Phys. Lett., 24, 600 (1974)Google Scholar
  27. 25.
    Perhaps because these interactions are so weak, several distinct crystalline forms of TMTTF-TCNQ have been observed (Refs. 23 and 32). The one described here, though different from that originally reported in Ref. 22, is by far the most prevalent (Ref. 23).Google Scholar
  28. 26.
    K. Bechgaard, D. O. Cowan, and A. N. Bloch, Chem. Comm., 1974, 937.Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    K. Bechgaard, T. J. Kistenmacher, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, Acta, Cryst. (in press).Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    K. Bechgaard, D. O. Cowan, and A. N. Bloch, Mol. Cryst. and Liq. Cryst., 32, 237 (1976).Google Scholar
  31. 29.
    T. E. Phillips, T. J. Kistenmacher, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, J. C. S. Chem. Comm., 1976, 334 (1976).Google Scholar
  32. 30.
    T. O. Poehler, unpublished.Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    L. B. Coleman, M. J. Cohen, D. J. Sandman, F. G. Yamagishi, A. F. Garito, and A. J. Heeger, Sol. St. Commm., 12, 1125 (1973).Google Scholar
  34. 32.
    T. J. Kistenmacher, T. E. Phillips, D. O. Cowan, J. P. Ferraris, and A. N. Bloch, Acta. Cryst., B32, 539 (1976).Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    Y. Tomkiewicz, B. A. Scott, L. J. Tao, and R. S. Title, Phys. Rev, Lett., 32, 1363 (1974).Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    T. O. Poehler, J. Bohandy, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, Bull. Amer. Phys., Soc., 21, 287 (1976).Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    Y. Tomkiewicz, T. D. Shultz, E. M. Engler, A. R. Taranko, and A. N. Bloch, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc., 21, 287 (1976). See also Ref. 13b.Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev., 89, 689 (1953).Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    R. J. Elliot, Phys. Rev., 96, 266 (1954).Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    Y. Yafet, Sol. St. Phys., 14, 1 (1963).Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    Y. Tomkiewicz, D. Garrod, A. R. Taranko, and A. N. Bloch, preprint.Google Scholar
  42. 40.
    J. C. Scott, A. F. Garito, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev., B10, 3131 (1974).Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    S. Etemad, private communication. 42. F. J. DiSalvo, W. A. Reed, F. Hsu, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, unpublished.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    F. B. Torrance, in Proceedings of the NATO Conference on the Chemistry and Physics of One-Dimensional Metals, Bolzano, Italy, ed. H. J. Keller (Plenum Press, New York, 1977), in press.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    P. A. Lee, T. M. Rice, and R. A. Klemm, preprint.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    V. J. Emery, in Proceedings of the NATO Conference on the Chemistry and Physics of One-Dimensional Metals, Bolzano, Italy, ed. H. J. Keller (Plenum Press, New York, 1977), in press.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    C. Weyl, E. M. Engler, S. Etemad, K. Bechgaard, and G. Jehanno, Sol. St. Comm., 19, 925 (1976).Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    The data for HMTSF-TCNQ (Ref. 42), first presented at the 1975 March meeting of the American Physical Society (Denver, Colo.), have been essentially reproduced by G. Soda, D. Jerome, M. Weger, K. Bechgaard, and E. Pederson, Sol. St. Comm., 19, (in press); see also Ref. 50a. Our results and interpretation were communicated directly to these authors in early 1976.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    T. Carruthers, unpublished.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    J. R. Cooper, M. Weger, D. Jerome, D. Lefur, K. Bechgaard, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, Sol. St. Comm., 19, 749 (1976).Google Scholar
  51. 50.(a)
    D. Jerome and H. Weger, Proceedings of the NATO Conference on the Chemistry and Physics of One-Dimensional Metals, Bolzano, Italy, ed. H. J. Keller (Plenum Press, New York, 1977), in pressGoogle Scholar
  52. 50(b).
    G. Soda, D. Jerome, M. Weger. J. M. Fabre, and L. Giral, Sol. St. Comm., 18, 1417 (1976).Google Scholar
  53. 51.
    A. N. Bloch, R. B. Weisman, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. Lett., 28, 753 (1972).Google Scholar
  54. 52.
    G. A. Thomas, et al., Phys. Rev., B13, 5105 (1976).Google Scholar
  55. 53.
    Substantial residual conductivities as T → O have also been observed in HMTSF-TNAP (Ref. 12) and in the halides of tetrathiatetracene, TTT (E. Perez-Albuerne, work presented at the 1976 March meeting of the American Physical Society [Atlanta, Ga.]; I. F. Schegolev, this volume.)Google Scholar
  56. 54.
    R. L. Greene, unpublished.Google Scholar
  57. 55.
    R. P. Groff, A. Suna, and R. E. Merrifield, Phys. Rev. Lett., 33, 418 (1974).Google Scholar
  58. 56.
    D. E. Schafer, F. Wudl, G. A. Thomas, J. P. Ferraris, and D. O. Cowan, Sol. St. Comm., 14, 347 (1974).Google Scholar
  59. 57.
    M. B. Salamon, J. W. Bray, G. DePasquali, R. A. Craven, R. Herman, G. Stucky, and A. Schultz, Phys. Rev., Bll, 619 (1975).Google Scholar
  60. 58.
    J. Bardeen, Sol. St. Comm., 13, 357 (1973).Google Scholar
  61. 59.
    M. J. Cohen, L. B. Coleman, A. F. Garito, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev., B10, 1298 (1974).Google Scholar
  62. 60.
    R. V. Gemmer, D. O. Cowan, A. N. Bloch, R. E. Pyle, and R. Banks, Mol. Cryst. and Liq. Cryst., 32, 227 (1976).Google Scholar
  63. 61.
    A. N. Bloch, J. P. Ferraris, D. O. Cowan, and T. O. Poehler, Sol. St. Comm., 13, 753 (1973).Google Scholar
  64. 62.
    L. J. Buravov and I. F. Schegolev, Prib. Tek. Eksp., 2, 171 (1971).Google Scholar
  65. 63.
    M. Cohen, S. K. Khanna, W. J. Gunning, A. F. Garito, and A. J. Heeger, Sol. St. Comm., 17, 367 (1975).Google Scholar
  66. 64.
    A. M. Clogston, Bell System Tech. J., 30, 491 (1951).Google Scholar
  67. 65.
    A. Madhukar and M. H. Cohen, preprint; A. A. Gogolin, V. I. Mel'nikov, and E. I. Rashba, this volume.Google Scholar
  68. 66.
    J. B. Torrance, E. E. Simonyi, and A. N. Bloch, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc., 20, 497 (1975), and to be published.Google Scholar
  69. 67.
    See, for example, P. E. Seiden and D. Cabib, Phys. Rev., B13, 1846 (1976).Google Scholar
  70. 68.
    R. A. Craven, M. B. Salamon, G. DePasquali, R. M. Herman, G. Stucky, and A. Schultz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 32, 769 (1974).Google Scholar
  71. 69.
    R. V. Gemmer, D. O. Cowan, T. O. Poehler, A. N. Bloch, and R. H. Banks, J. Org. Chem., 40, 3544 (1975).Google Scholar
  72. 70.
    H. Fukuyama, T. M. Rice, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. Lett., 33, 305 (1974).Google Scholar
  73. 71.
    A. Luther and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett., 33, 589 (1974).Google Scholar
  74. 72.
    T. Carruthers, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc., 21, 313 (1976), and to be published.Google Scholar
  75. 73.
    P. M. Horn and D. Rimai, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36, 809 (1976); and P. M. Horn and D. Guidotti, preprint.Google Scholar
  76. 74.
    P. Bak and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36, 978 (1976).Google Scholar
  77. 75.
    The 47 K anomaly in the conductivity, though absent in the data of Ref. 13c, has now been observed independently in several laboratories. To our knowledge it was first reported by us (Ref. 72), and separately by P. Horn and D. Guidotti, at the 1976 March meeting of the American Physical Society (Atlanta, Ga.).Google Scholar
  78. 76.
    See, for example, Aldert van der Ziel, Noise: Sources, Characterization, Measurement (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1970).Google Scholar
  79. 77.
    V. K. S. Shante, A. N. Bloch, T. Carruthers, and D. O. Cowan, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc., 21, 313 (1976), and to be published.Google Scholar
  80. 78.
    K. Bechgaard and B. S. Jensen, this volume.Google Scholar
  81. 79.
    P. Horn, private communication.Google Scholar
  82. 80.
    J. E. Gulley and J. F. Weiler, Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 1061 (1975).Google Scholar
  83. 81.
    Y. Tomkiewicz, A. R. Taranko, and J. B. Torrance, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36, 751 (1976).Google Scholar
  84. 82.
    T. O. Poehler, R. M. Somers, A. N. Bloch, and D. O. Cowan, preprint.Google Scholar
  85. 83.
    H. Kahlert, Sol. St. Comm., 17, 1161 (1975); K. Seeger, Sol. St. Comm., 19, 245 (1976).Google Scholar
  86. 84.
    M. J. Cohen, P. R. Newman, and A. J. Heeger, preprint.Google Scholar
  87. 85.
    See, for example, K. Seeger, Semiconductor Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
  88. 86.
    H. A. Mook and C. R. Watson, preprint.Google Scholar
  89. 87.
    M. J. Rice, A. R. Bishop, J. A. Krumhansl, and S. E. Trullinger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36, 432 (1976).Google Scholar
  90. 88.
    D. B. Tanner, C. S. Jacobsen, A. F. Garito, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 32, 1301 (1974); 33, 1559 (1974); Phys. Rev., B13, 3381 (1976).Google Scholar
  91. 89.
    U. Fano, Phys. Rev., 124, 1886 (1961).Google Scholar
  92. 90.
    This effect is distinct from the stabilization of the Peierls gap by the softening of intramolecular optical modes suggested by M. J. Rice, C. B. Duke, and N. O. Lipari [Sol. St. Comm., 17, 1089 (1975)].In fact, their calculation is flawed in its assumption that the phases of the intramolecular and intermolecular soft modes are arbitrary. The correct theory [A. Madhukar, Chem. Phys. Lett., 27, 606 (1974)] recognizes that the former modes build up charge around the lattice sites and the latter in the bonding regions; hence the two instabilities compete.Google Scholar
  93. 91.
    H. Hinkelmann and H. G. Reik, Sol. St. Comm., 16, 567 (1975).Google Scholar
  94. 92.
    J. J. Ritsko, D. J. Sandman, A. J. Epstein, P. C. Gibbons, S. E. Schnatterly, and J. Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 1330 (1975).Google Scholar
  95. 93.
    P. F. Williams and A. N. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett., 36, 64 (1976).Google Scholar
  96. 94.
    G. Giulliani, E. Tosatti, and M. P. Tosi, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 16, 385 (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Bloch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations